New Approach for Assessing and Improvement of Environmental Management and Strategies in Agri-Business

participating actors (decision-makers, implementers, 
beneficiaries, other stakeholders). 
What is more, that analysis unable us to predict 
likely cases of new public (local, national, international) 
failures due to impossibility to mobilize sufficient political 
support and necessary resources and/or ineffective 
implementation of otherwise “good” policies in the 
specific
socio-economic environment of a particular 
country, region, sub-sector etc. Since public failure is a 
feasible option its timely detection permits foreseeing 
the persistence or rising of certain environmental 
problems, and informing (local, international)
community 
about associated risks.
Suggested framework let better understand, 
assess and improve eco-management in the specific 
market, institutional and natural environment of 
individual farms, ecosystems, regions, sub-sectors and 
countries. However, its application requires new type of 
data for the formal and informal rights distribution, 
system and efficiency of enforcements, personal chara-
cteristics (preferences, interests, capability etc.) of 
New Approach for Assessing and Improvement of Environmental Management and Strategies in Agri-
Business
12
Global Journal of Management and Business Research Volume XIII Issue VII Version I
Y
2013
ear
(
)
A
© 2013 Global Journals Inc. (US)
1. Bachev H. (2004). Efficiency of Agrarian Organi-
zations, Farm Management and Rural Planning No 
5, Fukuoka: Kyushu University Press, 135-150.
2. Bachev H. (2010). Governance of Agrarian 
Sustainability. New York: Nova Science Publisher.
Bachev H. (2011). Efficiency of Economic Orga-
nizations and Public Policy Interventions in 
Agriculture, in Agricultural Policies: New Develop-
ments, Editor L. Contreras, New York: Nova 
Science, 55-86.
VIII.
C
onclusion
agents related to eco-management in agri-business, 
type of eco-challenges, formal and informal forms of 
agrarian organization and contractual arrangements, 
critical dimensions of activities and transactions etc.
R
eferences

---

3.
Bachev, H. and Labonne, M. (2000). About 
Organization of Agrarian Innovations, Montpellier: 
INRA.
4.
Coase, R. (1960). The Problem of Social Costs, 
Journal of Law and Economics 3, 1-44.
5.
FAO (2010). Pressure-State-Response Framework 
and Environmental Indicators, Rome: Food and 
Agriculture Organization.
6.
Furuboth, E. and Richter, R. (1998). Institutions and 
Economic Theory. Contribution of New Institutional 
Economics, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan 
Press.
7.
MEA (2005). Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 
Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis, 
Washington: Island Press.
8.
North D. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change 
and Economic Performance, Cambridge: Cam-
bridge University Press.
9.
Williams
on O. (1996). Mechanisms of Governance, 
New York: Oxford University Press.
New Approach for Assessing and Improvement of Environmental Management and Strategies in Agri-
Business
© 2013 Global Journals Inc. (US)
13
Global Journal of Management and Business Research Volume XIII Issue VII Version I
Y
2013
ear
(
)
A

---

Document Outline

• 1. New Approach for Assessing and Improvement of Environmental Management and Strategies in Agri-Business
• Author
• Keywords
• I. Introduction
• II. Agro-Eco-Management Modes andStrategies
• III. Needs and Factors of Eco-Management and Strategies inAgri-Business
• IV. Efficiency of Agro-Eco-Management and Strategies
• V. (TheMost) EffectiveFormsforAgro-Eco-Management
• VI. PublicModesandStrategiesforManagement ofNaturalResourcesinAgriculture
• VII. StagesinAnalysisofEnvironmentalManagementandStrategiesinAgri-Business
• VIII. Conclusion
• References