Original citation

Politics 45(6) 2008, pp.650–74.
Korf, B. ‘Resources, violence and the telluric geographies of small wars’, Progress in 
Human Geography 35(6) 2011, pp.733–56.
Krahmann, E. ‘National, regional and global governance: one phenomenon or 
many? Global Governance 9(3) 2003, pp.323–46.
Layne, C. ‘Impotent power? Re-examining the nature of America’s hegemonic 
power?’, The National Interest 85 2006, pp.41–47.
Le Billon, P. ‘The geopolitical economy of “resource wars”’, Geopolitics 9(1) 2004, 
pp.1–28.
Lebow, R.N. ‘The long peace, the end of the Cold War and the failure of realism’, 
International Organization 48(2) 1994, pp.249–77.
Levy, M. ‘Is the environment a national security issue?’, International Security 20(2) 
1995, pp.35–62. 
Little, R. ‘The English School vs. American Realism: a meeting of minds or divided 
by a common language?’, Review of International Studies 29(3) 2003, pp.443–
60.
Mann, M. ‘Has globalization ended the rise and rise of the nation state?’, Review of 
International Political Economy 4(3) 1997, pp.472–96. 
Moravcik, A. ‘Taking preferences seriously: a liberal theory of international 
politics’, International Organization 51(4) 1997, pp.513–53.
Morton, A. ‘New follies on the state of the globalization debate’, Review of 
International Studies 30(1) 2004, pp.133–47. 

---

11 Introduction to international relations
10
Osiander, A ‘Sovereignty, international relations and the Westphalian myth’, 
International Organization 55(2) 2001, pp.251–87.
Osiander, A. ‘Rereading early 20th century IR theory: idealism revisited’, 
International Studies Quarterly 42(3) 1998, pp.409–32.
Pang, T. and G.E. Guindo ‘Globalization and risks to health’ Science & Society, 
EMBO Reports 5(1) 2004, pp.S11–16 www.nature.com/embor/journal/v5/n1s/
full/7400226.html 
Pelletier, N. ‘Of laws and limits: an ecological economic perspective on redressing 
the failure of contemporary global environmental governance’, Global 
Environmental Change 20(2) 2010, pp.220–28.
Risse, T. ‘Ideas, discourse power and the end of the Cold War: 20 years on’, 
International Politics 48(4/5) 2011, pp.591–606. 
Rosenberg, J. ’Globalization theory: a post-mortem’, International Politics 42(1) 
2005, pp.3–74.
Schmidt, B. ‘Anarchy, world politics and the birth of a discipline’, International 
Relations 16(1) 2002, pp.9–32. 
Schmidt, B. ‘Lessons from the past: reassessing interwar disciplinary history of 
international relations’, International Studies Quarterly 42(3) 1998, pp.433–59.
Schmidt, B. ‘Political science and the American Empire: a disciplinary history 
of the “politics” section and the discourse of imperialism and colonialism’, 
International Politics 45(6) 2008, pp.675–87. 
Scholte, J.A. ‘Global capitalism and the state’, International Affairs 73(3) 1997, 
pp.427–52.
Schroeder, P.W. ‘The 19th century international system: changes in the structure’, 
World Politics 39(1) 1986, pp.1–26.
Schweller, R. and W. Wohlforth ‘Power test: updating Realism in response to the 
end of the Cold War’, Security Studies 9(3) 2000, pp.60–108.
Singer, P.W. ‘Corporate warriors: the rise of privatized military industry and its 
ramifications for international security’, International Security 26(3) 2001–2, 
pp.186–220.
Singh, R. ‘The exceptional empire: why the United States will not decline – again’, 
International Politics 45 2008, pp.571–93.
Smith, S. ‘The discipline of international relations: still an American social science’, 
British Journal of Politics and International Relations 2(3) 2000, pp.374–402. 
Smith, S. ‘The United States and the discipline of international relations: 
hegemonic country, hegemonic discipline’, International Studies Review 4(2) 
2002, pp.67–85.
Snyder, J. ‘The domestic political logic of Gorbachev’s new thinking in foreign 
policy’, International Politics 48(4/5) 2011, pp.562–74.
Sofka, J.R. `The eighteenth century international system: parity or primacy?’, 
Review of International Studies 27(2) 2001, pp.147–63.
Sterling-Folcker, J. ‘Realism and the constructivist challenge’, International Studies 
Review 4(1) 2002, pp.73–100. 
Strange, S. ‘The westfailure system’, Review of International Studies 25(3) 1999, 
pp.345–54.
Suganami, H. ‘Explaining war: some critical observations’, International Relations 
16(3) 2002, pp.307–26. 
Tickner, J.A. ‘You just don’t understand: troubled engagements between feminism and 
IR theorists’, International Studies Quarterly 41(4) 1997, pp.611–32.
Van Evera, S. ‘Offense, defence, and the causes of war’, International Security 22(4) 
1997, pp.5–43.
Van Ham, P. ‘The power of war: why Europe needs it’, International Politics 47(6) 
2010, pp.574–95.
Waever, O. ‘The sociology of a not so international discipline: American and 
European developments in international relations’, International Organization 
52(4) 1998, pp.687–727.
Walt, S.M. ‘International relations: one world, many theories’, Foreign Policy 110 
1998, pp.29–47.

---

Introduction
11
Weiss, L. ‘Globalization and the myth of the powerless state’, New Left Review 225 
1997, pp.3–27.
Wendt, A. ‘Anarchy is what states make of it: the social construction of power 
politics’, International Organisation 46(2) 1992, pp.391–425.
White, D.H. ‘The nature of world power in American history: an evaluation at the 
end of World War II’, Diplomatic History 11(3) 1984, pp.181–202.
Williams, M. ‘The empire writes back (to Michael Cox)’, International Affairs 
83(5) 2007, pp.945–50.
Wohlforth, William ‘No one loves a Realist explanation’, International Politics 
48(4/5) 2011, pp.441–59.
Youngs, G. ‘From practice to theory: feminist international relations and “gender 
mainstreaming”’, International Politics 45(6) 2008, pp.688–702.