Phraseology and Culture in English

Stage III
The word reasonable continues to imply the ability to think 
well, but it becomes increasingly associated with an emphasis on the limita-
tions of one’s knowledge and on the lack of certainty. Conviction is no 
longer described as reasonable, and a reasonable doubt (with the emphasis 
on reasonable) becomes reinterpreted as any reasonable doubt (with the 
emphasis on any). The semantic component ‘I don’t want to say more’ 
becomes part of the semantic invariant: the ability to think well becomes 
associated with the concern about not saying more than one has evidence or 
justification for. 
Stage IV
The self-limitation inherent in collocations like it is reason-
able to suppose (where reasonable is no longer compatible with conviction)
leads to the rise of reasonable as a more general tool of “moderation”, as a 
device for avoiding an “excessive” (unjustified) use of words like much (‘a 
lot’) and very. As a result, we witness the spread of collocations like a rea-
sonable time and a reasonable amount – clearly distinct in meaning from a
reasonable assumption or a reasonable hypothesis.
Stage V
Reasonable as an “anti-much” and “anti-very” device becomes 
linked, in a particular way, with avoiding “excessive praise”: it becomes 
increasingly used as a device for not saying “very good”. At the same time, 
however, it becomes associated with a willingness to say a qualified “good” 
even when one cannot say “very good”, that is, to be satisfied with less, to 
be “realistic” and “pragmatic”. 
Stage VI
The willingness to accept things as “reasonably good” even if 
they are not “very good” becomes linked in a special way with interpersonal 
relations, and, more specifically, with what one wants from other people. 
Collocations like a reasonable request and a reasonable deal spread, collo-
cations like reasonable demands decline, and sentences like “Be reason-
able” start to be interpreted as a call for a “reasonable compromise”. 

---

Reasonably well
67