Psixodiagnostika Universitetlar uchun darslik

Psy-
86,
Eysenck H. J. Personality and factor analysis: A reply to Guilrofd. Psychological Bulle-
tin, 84, №3,405-411.
Adabiyot 3 3 3
Eysenck, H. J. (1971). The IQ argument: Race, intelligence and education. New York:
Library Press.
Eysenck J., Eysenck S. B. G. (1975a). Manual the Eysenck personality questionnaire.
London: Hodder and Stoughton.
Eysenck, H.J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1975b). The Eysenck Personality Questionnaire Ma-
nual. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
Eysenck H. J., Eysenck S. B. G. (1977). Comments block and
86,
Eysenck H. J., Eysenck S. B. G. (1976).
as a
of personality. Lon-
don: Hodder and Stoughton.
Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (Eds.). (1991). Improvement of
behaviour as
a function of dietary supplementation. Personality and Individual Differences, 12,
329-65.
Fancher, R. E. (1985). The intelligence men: Makers of the
controversy. New York:
W. W. Norton & Co.
Farber, S. L. (1981). Identical
reared apart: A reanalysis. New York: Basic books.
Finegan, J. E., & Alien, N. J. (1994). Computerized and written questionnaires: are they
equivalent? Computers in Human Behavior,
Fiske D. W. (1971). Measuring the concepts of personality. Chicago: Aldine
Co.
Fletcher, R.
Science, ideology
the media: The Cyril Burt scandal. New Brun-
swick, NJ: Transaction Books.
R. (1984). The mean
of Americans: Massive gains 1932 to 1978. Psychologi-
cal Bulletin, 95,
R. (1987). Massive IQgains in 14 nations: What IQtests really measure? Psy-
chological Bulletin, 101, N°
J. (1999). The discovery of
over time. American Psychologist, 54, № 1,
5-20.
Frank, G. (1983). The Wechsler Enterprise. Oxford:
Press.
Fulker, D. W. (1975). [Review of «The science and politics of IQ.»]
of
Psychology,
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Ba-
sic Books.
Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. New York: Basic Books.
Goddard, H. H. (1913). The Binet tests in relation to
Asthenics,
Goddard, H. H. (1917). Mental tests and the
Journal of Delinquency, 2,243-
277.
Goldberg L. R. (1963). Model of item ambiguity in personality assessment.
and
Psychol. Measurement,
Goldberg, L. R. (1971). A historical survey of personality scales and inventories. In
P. McReynolds (Ed.), Advances in psychological assessment. Palo Alto: Science and
Behavior Books.
Goldstein, G. & Hersen, M. (Eds.) (1984). Handbook of psychological assessment
(pp. 181-210).
NY:
Press.
Goodwin, W. L., & Driscoll, L. A. (1980). Handbook for measurement and evaluation in
early childhood education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
3 3 4 adabiyot
Gottschalk, L A., & Gleser, G. S. (1969). The measurement of psychological states through
the content analysis of verbal behavior. Los Angeles, CA: University of California
Press.
Gould, S. J. (1981). The mismeasure of man. New
W. W. Norton.
Graham, J. R., & Lilly, R. S. (1984). Psychological testing.
Cliffs, NJ: Pren-
tice-Hall.
Green B. F. (1991). Guidelines for computer testing.
B. Gutkin & S. L. Wise (Eds.).
The computer and the decision-making process. Hills-dale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Green B. F. (1988). Critical problems in computer-based psychological measurement.
Applied Measurement in Education,
Greene, R. L. (1991). The MMPI-2/MMPI: An interpretive manual. Boston:
&
Bacon.
Gregory, R. J.
Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Tests in Print
(1961).Griphon.
Gronbach L. J., Gleser G. S. (1965). Psychological Tests and Personnel decisions.
Gronlund, N. E. (1993). How to make achievement tests and assessments (5th ed.). Bos-
ton, MA: Allyn.
G. (1984), Handbook of Psychological Assessment, New York: Van Nos-
trand Reinhold Co.
Guastello, S. J., &
M. L. (1990). The
effect and validity of
computerbased test interpretations: the Human Resource Development Report. Psychological