Review Article Stefanie Panke* Design Thinking in Education: Perspectives, Opportunities and Challenges


particularly in management. ‘Design thinking’ then becomes a


Download 495.81 Kb.
Pdf ko'rish
bet4/44
Sana04.04.2023
Hajmi495.81 Kb.
#1324917
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   44
Bog'liq
10.1515 edu-2019-0022

particularly in management. ‘Design thinking’ then becomes a 
simplified version of ‘designerly thinking’ or a way of describing 
a designer’s methods that is integrated into an academic or 
practical management discourse. (Johansson‐Sköldberg et al., 
2013, p. 123)
Elsbach and Stigliani (2018) describe design thinking as an 
approach to problem solving that uses tools traditionally 
utilized by designers of commercial products, processes
and environments. According to Cochrane and Munn 
(2016) the three main elements of design thinking are 
observational research, visual sense making, and rapid 
prototyping. The authors describe a typical design thinking 
process as a cycle of (1) empathizing and observing, (2) 
defining the problem, (3) creating ideas, (4) prototyping
and (5) testing (Cochrane & Munn, 2016). 
Design thinking has been recognized repeatedly 
for its contributions to business and management 
practices. This has led to an increase in the number of 
higher education programs that teach design thinking to 
business students, managers and executives (Matthews 
& Wrigley, 2017). In order to be marketable and 
competitive, students need to understand, embrace and 
generate innovation by developing and implementing 
new and meaningful ideas (Wright & West, 
2010). Moreover, even the design discipline recognizes 
that the procedural knowledge of design thinking might 
be more important than the actual design skills – “the 
survival of design as a profession may depend less on 
traditional design education and more on responding 
strategically to contemporary changes, influenced by 
ethical and environmental issues as well as technological 
advancements” (Cassim, 2013). 
In the context of this article, I follow a similar view 
of design thinking as a process and mindset, specifically 
positioned to address wicked problems in line with the rich 
descriptions by von Thienen, Meinel, and Nicolai (2014):
Design thinking offers ample help to solve wicked problems of a 
liberal type where you may fail and experiment first to become all 
the more successful later on. It does so by establishing mindsets 
and offering tools which save you from the impossible task of 
finding ‘the correct problem view’ or ‘the optimal solution’. 
Instead, attention is drawn to needs which await their fulfillment. 
New interpretations of the problem are advanced which take into 
account the perspectives of different stakeholders and which help 
to look at the matter from a new angle – since the old problem 
views turned out to be blind alleys. Finally, a lot of tools are 
provided to propel the process of problem solving in a productive 
direction – making sure the process remains flexible, jaunty and 
unrestrained by arbitrary formalizations. (von Thienen et al. 
2014, p. 105)

Download 495.81 Kb.

Do'stlaringiz bilan baham:
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   44




Ma'lumotlar bazasi mualliflik huquqi bilan himoyalangan ©fayllar.org 2024
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling