87
Table 4.3 Inter-Group t-test of Post-Oral Performance (N=60)
n
M
MD
13
SD
T
p
Control
30
69.53
7.26
8.33
Experimental 30
76.80
5.70
2.78
.009**
** p < .01
In addition to the inter-group analysis presented above, the results of the
intra-group comparison were also presented as follows.
The first intra-group
analysis was made on the experimental group. As shown in Table 4.4, the
experimental group gained 8.07 in the post-test, comparing with the scores they got
from the pre-test. Such gain was statistically significant since the p-value was as
low as .00.
Table 4.4 Results of t-test on Oral Task in Experimental Group (N=60)
M
n
SD
MD
(Post-Pre)
t
p
Pre
68.73
30
5.71
8.07
3.76
.00**
Post
76.80
30
5.70
** p < .01
In contrast to the significant improvement of the experimental group in the oral
task, the control group, instead of making progress in
the post-test oral performance,
scored lower than their own pre-test performance. As shown in Table 4.5, the mean
score of the pre-test in the control group was 70.50, but the score of the post-test was
69.53, slightly lower than the pre-test.
In other words, unlike the significant
progress in the experimental group’s oral performance, the control group’s
scores on
oral performance dropped 0.97 as illustrated in Table 4.5. The difference between
the score of the pre-test and that of the post test was not statistically significant (p
= .76), as shown in Table 4.5.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: