Samarkand davlat universiteti

ADABIYOTLAR

1. 
   Abramson, M. 1996. Toward a more holistic understanding of ethics in social work.
   
2. 
   Social Work in Health Care 23.2:1-15. Allen, J. A. 1993. The coiistructivist paradigm: Values and ethics. Journal of Teaching
   
3. 
   Appleby, G., E. Colon, and J. Hamilton. 2001.(Diversity, oppression, and Social Func­tioning: Person In-Environment Assessment and Intervention. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
   
4. 
   Bricker-Jenkins, M., N. Hooeyman, and N. Clottlieb, eds. 1991. Feminist Social Work Practice in Clinical Settings. Newbury Park1, Calif.: Sage.
   
5. 
   Center for Human Rights. 1994. Human Rights and Social Work: A Manual for Schools of Social Work and the Social Work Profession. Training Series no. i. Geneva: United Nations.
   
6. 
   Cohen, R. 2002. The politics of ethics. The Nation (April 8): 21-23.
   
7. 
   Compton, B. R. and B. Galaway. 1994. Social Work Processes. 5th ed. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth.
   
8. 
   Congress, E. 1999. Social Work Values and Ethics: Identifying and Resolving Profes­sional Dilemmas. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
   
9. 
   Cowger, C. 1994. Assessing client strengths: Clinical assessment for client empower­ment. Social Work: Journal of the National Association of Social Workers 39.3: 262-67.
   
10. 
    Devore, W. and E. Schlesinger. 1996. Ethiiic-sensitive Social Work Practice. 5th ed. Boston. Allyn & Bacon.
    
11. 
    Falck, H. 1988. Social Work: Tlie Membership Perspective. New York: Springer.
    
12. 
    Germain, C. B. and A. Gitterman. 1996. The Life Model of Social Work Practice, id ed. New York: Columbia University Press.
    
13. 
    Goldstein, H. 1992. "If social work hasn't made progress as a science, might it be an art?" Families in Society: Journal of Contemporary Human Services (January): 48-55.
    
14. 
    Gutierrez, L. M. 1990. Working with women of color: An empowerment perspective. Social Work: Journal of the National Association of Social Workers 35:149-53.
    
15. 
    Ife, J. 2001. Human Rights and Social Work: Towards Rights-based Practice. Cam­bridge: Cambridge University Press.
    
16. 
    International Federation of Social Workers (IFSW). 2000. See www.ifsw.orgG’ publicationG’4.5.3 pub.html.
    
17. 
    Loewenberg, F. M. and R. Dolgoff. 1992. Ethical Decisions for Social Work Practice. Itasca, 111.: Peacock.
    
18. 
    Krist-Ashman, K. K. and G. H. Hull. 1993. Understanding Generalist Practice. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
    
19. 
    Lee, J. 1994. The Empowerment Approach to Social Work Practice. New York: Colum­bia University Press.
    
20. 
    Mannig, S. 1997. The social worker as a moral citizen: Ethics in action. Social Work: Journal of the National Association of Social Workers 42.3: 223-30.
    
21. 
    Mattison, M. 2000. Ethical Decision-making: The person in the process. Social Work: Journal of the National Association of Social Workers 45.3: 201-12.
    
22. 
    Mayer, M. 1955. Tliey Thought They Were Free: The Germans, 1933-1955. Chicago: Uni­versity of Chicago Press.
    
23. 
    McGoldrick, M., J. Giordano, and J. Pearce, eds. 1996. Ethnicity and Family Therapy.
    
24. 
    National Association of Social Workers (NASW). 1996. Code of Ethics. Washington, D.C: NASW Press.
    
25. 
    ------. 2000. Social Work Speaks: National Association of Social Workers Policy State­ments, 2000-2003. 5th ed. Washington, D.C.: NASW Press.
    
26. 
    Pinderhughes, E. 1989. Understanding Race, Ethnicity, and Power: The Key to Efficacy in Clinical Practice. New York: Free Press.
    
27. 
    Reamer, F. 19'95. Social Work Values and Ethics. New York: Columbia University Press.
    
28. 
    ------. 1998. Ethical Standards in Social Work: A Critical Review of the NASW Code of
    
29. 
    Ethics. Washington, D.C.: NASW Press.
    
30. 
    Reichert, E. looia. Move from social justice to human rights provides new perspec­tive. Professional Development: The International Journal of Continuing Social Work Education 4.1: 5-13.
    
31. 
    ------. looib. Placing human rights at the center of the social work profession. Jour­nal oflntergroup Relations 28.1 (Spring): 43-50.
    
32. 
    Roche, S. and M. Dewees. 200r. Teaching About Human Rights in Social Work. Jour­nal of Teaching in Social Work 21.1-2:137-55.
    
33. 
    Saleebey, D., pd. 2002. The Strengths Perspective in Social Work Practice. 3d ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
    
34. 
    Shulman, L. 1999. Skills of Helping Individuals and Groups. 4th ed. Itasca, 111.: Pea­cock.
    
35. 
    Simon, B. 19941 The Empowerment Tradition in American Social Work. New York: Co­lumbia University Press.
    
36. 
    Solomon, B. 1976. Black Empowerment: Social Work in oppressed Communities. New York: Columbia University Press.
    
37. 
    Staub-Bernasconi, S. 1998. Soziale Arbeit als Menschenrechtsprofession. In A. Woehiie, ed., Profession und Wissenschaft Sozialer Arbeit: Positionen in einer Phase der generellen Neuverortnnng und Spezifika, 305-32. Pfaffenweiler, Ger.: Cenaurus.
    
38. 
    Swenson, C.'i998. Clinical social work's contribution to a social justice perspective. Social Work: Journal of the National Association of Social Workers 43.6: 527-37.
    
39. 
    United Nations. 1948. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Adopted December 10, 1948. GA. Res. 217 AIII. United Nations Document aG’8io. New York: UN.
    
40. 
    Van Den Bergh, N. and L. B. Cooper, eds. 1986. Feminist Visions for Social Work. Sil­ver Spring, Md.: NASW.
    
41. 
    Van Wornier, K. 1997. Social Welfare: A World View. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
    
42. 
    Webster's. 1989. [ Webster's] Encyclopedia: An Unabridged Dictionary of the English Language. New York: Portland House.
    
43. 
    Witkin, S. 1998. Human rights and social work. Social Work: Journal of the National Association of Social Workers 43:197-201.
    
44. 
    ------. 2000. Ethics-R-Us. Social Work: Journal of the National Association of Social
    
45. 
    Workers 45.3:197-200.