Samarkand state institute of foreign languages course paper theme: context, its types and its role in the determination of different meaning

CONCLUSION
In conclusion, The global of lexis is big and complicated and it's far usually everyday in psycholinguistics that it's far represented as a part of a massive complicated network. However, in systemic practical linguistics modelling lexis has remained a incredibly underdeveloped place of the principle. The thoughts underpinning this paper stem from exploring the interface of context and lexicology, asking how SFL does and will deal with lexis in the concept. Here the SFL idea of context is used to expand a comparable account of lexis. The argumentation is primarily based totally on the idea that ‘understanding about’ context and 'understanding about’ lexis is contained and maintained inside a networked cognitive system. The not unusualplace view of the connection among context and lexis is normally certainly considered one among disambiguation, regularly thru collocation. However, I argue that there may be extra concerned than that. In this paper, I use the SFL technique to context to set up the primary steps toward an identical method to lexicology. The end supplied right here is that it's miles theoretically workable to attract at the size of instantiation, in a complementary manner to delicacy, to be able to version lexis as maximum nearby context, in which the lexeme is modelled as which means capability.
As appealing as it can appear to version lexis as maximum sensitive grammar, it isn't always with out troubles as could be mentioned under. This paper introduces a brand new theoretical attitude on lexis in SFL principle with the aid of using growing it inside a distinctive measurement, instantiation, which as can be shown, ends in a specific method – lexis as maximum neighborhood context. Looked at from the attitude of instantiation, lexis may be visible in phrases of which means ability and as I argue on this paper, thru this lens, the SFL idea of ‘context’ may be prolonged to account for the connection among a lexeme and its instantiation as a lexical object in textual content. This is a probably interesting improvement given that it may provide a bridge among the extra textually orientated principle of SFL and the extra lexically pushed strategies to lexis as generally discovered inside corpus linguistics.
The dimensions stated above, delicacy and instantiation, offer complementary instead of contradictory strategies. Work on lexis inside SFL is scarce as could be mentioned beneath and as with maximum hard regions, there may be benefit in tackling a hassle from multiple angle. The realm of phrase have a look at is the area of lexicology and so it appears realistic to invite whether or not there may be any not unusualplace floor to be located among this extra backside up technique to the lexico-grammar and SFL’s extra pinnacle down technique. The factor of departure and the character of the issues are very special. Lexicologists have a tendency first of all the phrase because the unit of observe and paintings outwards, wherein outwards can suggest into the thoughts or lexicon or into textual content and beyond. Lexicology covers all regions of hobby associated with what we consider because the phrase from lexical semantics to etymology and morphology, together with the overall place of phraseology. When it involves phraseology, connections to context provide a ability region of not unusualplace hobby to the 2 views at the lexico-grammar. What they percentage to a point is an hobby in lexico-grammar and in information that focusses on “the prevalence of styles which lie someplace among summary systems and character lexical gadgets or mixtures of these”. The interface of context and lexicology spans the variety of lexical research from the extra cognitive angle to the greater social attitude.