Bahrick (1984) has shown that the most important thing
in learning a word is the
first encounter; he found effects of this eight years later. Practice may not be able
to make up for a disastrous first encounter.
Organizing words in the mind
Much teaching of vocabulary implies that the effective way of learning vocabulary
is to organize the words into groups in our mind. Hence we saw coursebooks using
vocabulary sets even when Rosch’s work suggests this
is not the normal way of
learning.
Touchstone (McCarthy
et al., 2005) tells the students in Lesson 2, ‘Here are
some things students take to class’, and then lists ‘umbrella’, ‘pencil’, and so on –
that is, reversing Rosch’s sequence by starting with a superordinate category.
Organizing may consist of putting related words in a ‘word map’.
International
Express (Taylor, 1996) gets students to fill in empty bubbles in a diagram that links
‘Air travel’ to ‘Luggage’, ‘Documents’, and so on. Or it may mean thinking about
aspects
of the word form, say word endings such as ‘-er’ or prefixes such as ‘con-’.
Organizing words in groups by common morphology linked to meaning may be a
useful way of remembering them.
Tapestry 1 Listening and Speaking (Benz and
Dworak, 2000),
for instance, asks students to characterize nouns for professions
both as ‘-or’ (actor), ‘-ist’ (typist), or ‘-ian’ (musician) and then as different types of
career (medical careers,
entertainers, public service, and so on). The book does not,
however, point out that ‘driver’ has now made the transition
from human being to
machine that many ‘-er’ words take, such as ‘computer’, ‘typewriter’ and ‘reader’.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: