Sector Assistance Program Evaluation on Education in Uzbekistan
Technical assistance evaluation
Download 402.67 Kb. Pdf ko'rish
|
47178666 (1)
Technical assistance evaluation.
In addition, a 2002 TA performance audit report (TPAR) 36 evaluated six TAs that supported the effective management of investments and reform 36 ADB. 2002. Technical Assistance Performance Audit Report on Selected Technical Assistance in the Education Sector in Three Central Asian Republics. Manila. The six TAs covered include: (i) Education and Training Sector Study (2308-KAZ), (ii) Strengthening Educational Administration and Management at the Central and Local Levels TA (2872-KAZ), (iii) Education and Training Master Plan TA (2290-KGZ), (iv) Strengthening of Education Planning 14 in basic education in three CARs: Kazakhstan, Kyrgyz Republic, and Uzbekistan. According to the 2002 TPAR, the TAs were influential in improving the relevance, quality, and efficiency of the education sectors in the countries studied; and in rationalizing their organization and structure. The TAs contributed to the development of strategies aimed at sustaining reforms through cost effectiveness, resource mobilization, and a comprehensive management information system. Commenting on the rapid growth of the education sector in the CARs, the TPAR noted that the main reasons were: (i) the rapidly changing economic conditions of the CARs, (ii) the new priorities of the governments, (iii) the changing pattern of employment and the marketability of skills, and (iv) the increasing presence of the private sector in higher education (pp. 1–2, para. 3). 46. The TPAR included two Uzbekistan TAs (Monitoring the Implementation of Education Reform and Capacity Building in Education Finance). These were attached to the BETDP loan. The related TA completion reports (TCRs) are discussed later on. The TPAR rates both these TAs as highly successful. However, except for the TA for Monitoring the Implementation of Education Reform, no provision for dissemination was made in the design of the reviewed TAs. The TPAR identified the TA for Capacity Building in Education Finance as one of the two best reports in terms of the quality of research, the substance of analysis, and the appropriateness of recommendations. 47. Lessons. Given the availability of CAPE 2006, the project completion reports (PCRs) and the TCRs, among others, a number of the lessons for improving ADB operations in the education sector in Uzbekistan can be identified. These have been pooled and are presented along with their sources in Appendix 5. A brief, synthesized and stylized version is presented below before moving on to the top–down and bottom–up evaluation in this report. 48. Download 402.67 Kb. Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |
Ma'lumotlar bazasi mualliflik huquqi bilan himoyalangan ©fayllar.org 2024
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling