Simple Sentence a simple sentence consists of just one independent clause: Mary had a little lamb. Compound Sentence

Simple Sentence a simple sentence consists of just one independent clause: Mary had a little lamb. Compound Sentence

79. DIFFERENT CLASSIFICATIONS OF SENTENCES

Simple Sentence

A simple sentence consists of just one independent clause:

Mary had a little lamb.

Compound Sentence

A compound sentence consists of two independent clauses. These can be joined by a coordinating conjunction or a punctuation mark such as a semi-colon, colon, or dash:

Mary had a little lamb | and | its wool was white as snow.
Mary had a little lamb | ; | its wool was white as snow.
Mary had a little lamb | — | she kept it for its wool.

Complex Sentence

A complex sentence consists of one independent clause and any number of dependent clauses:

Wherever Mary went, | the lamb would go as well.
In this example, the first clause is dependent and the second is independent.

Compound-Complex Sentence

Finally, a compound-complex sentence consists of two independent clauses and any number of dependent clauses:

Although the children loved the lamb, | the teacher disapproved of lambs | so | she told Mary to take it home.
In this example, the first clause is dependent, whereas the last two (joined by a coordinating conjunction) are independent.


80.SURVEY OF FUNCTION WORDS
Although recentlythere have been multiple successful appli-cations of authorship attribution, the fieldis not particularly good at the explicationof methods and theoretical issues, whichmight eventually compromise the accep-tance of new research results in the tra-ditional humanities community. I wish topartially help remedy this lack of explica-tion and theory, by contributing a theoreti-cal discussion on the use of function wordsin stylometry. I will concisely survey theattractiveness of function words in stylom-etry and relate them to the use of charac-ter n-grams. At the end of this paper, Iwill propose to replace the term ‘functionword’ by the term ‘functor’ in stylometry,due to multiple theoretical considerations.1 IntroductionComputational authorship attribution is a popu-lar application in current stylometry, the compu-tational study of writing style. While there havebeen significant advances recently, it has been no-ticed that the field is not particularly good at theexplication of methods, let alone at developing agenerally accepted theoretical framework (Craig,1999; Daelemans, 2013). Much of the researchin the field is dominated by an ‘an engineeringperspective’: if a certain attribution technique per-forms well, many researchers do not bother to ex-plain or interpret this from a theoretical perspec-tive. Thus, many methods and procedures con-tinue to function as a black box, a situation whichmight eventually compromise the acceptance ofexperimental results (e.g. new attributions) byscholars in the traditional humanities community.In this short essay I wish to try to help partiallyremedy this lack of theoretical explication, by con-tributing a focused theoretical discussion on theuse of function words in stylometry. While thesefeatures are extremely popular in present-day re-search, few studies explicitly address the method-ological implications of using this word category.I will concisely survey the use of function words instylometry and render more explicit why this wordcategory is so attractive when it comes to author-ship attribution. I will deliberately use a genericlanguage that is equally intelligible to people inlinguistic as well as literary studies. Due to mul-tiple considerations, I will argue at the end of thispaper that it might be better to replace the term‘function word’ by the term ‘functor’ in stylome-try.2 Seminal WorkUntil recently, scholars agreed on the supremacyof word-level features in computational authorshipstudies.