Special education of uzbekistan karshi state university the faculty of roman-german philology
Download 270.19 Kb.
|
DIPLOM ISH JOZIBA
|
Conclusion.
Having investigated the problem of artistic qualities of the novel Pride and Prejudice by a famous writer Jane Austen we came to the following conclusions: Pride and Prejudice, has been on top of the reading lists of Jane Austen. In Austen’s artistic gallery, the portrayal of women is colorful and glittering. The panoramic view of female figures in man-dominated world, and the true description of inside-track examination of womankind, attracts eternal attention. In addition, the portraits of the men are no less noteworthy. These include the complexities of Darcy’s personality, the eccentric Mr. Bennet, the good natured, impressionable Mr. Bingley, the mediocre Mr. Collins, and the hypocritical Mr. Wickham. They are not some essential ornaments and their significant sense and position can’t acquire its deserved illumination in the artistic structures of Austen’s novel. In 19th century, marriage was dominated by material base in English society. Social relationships and economic mode determined the rule of marriage. In Austen’s day, the only road for mid-class lady’s happy life was to marry well. The wrong choice of mate could spell social and financial disaster. Almost every woman’s ideal man was a millionaire or at least a single gentleman with a piece of estate and much money every year. However, Jane Austen brought us a fresh wind about happy marriage and her ideal man two century ago. From Austen’s viewpoint, her ideal man is a single man with extraordinary understanding, integrate personality, thick material base and social status. Jane Austen’s work seems little touched by political events in her world or by major literary trends of her day. She focuses instead on themes of social class, middle class manners, gender issues, courtship and marriage, all of which come together in Pride and Prejudice. Perhaps it is these timeless themes that draw readers back again and again to this novel. Literature. I.A.Karimov. Yuksak ma’naviyat – engilmas kuch. T., Ma’naviyat, 2008. “On measures to further improvement to foreign languages learning system” Xalq so’zi, December 10, 2012. Adams Margaret. (1976). Single Blessedness: Observations on the Single Status in Married Society. New York: Basic Books. Alexander Michael, A History of English literature. London, Macmillan, 2000. Arnold I.V., Dyakonova N.Ya., Three Centuries of English Poetry. Leningrad,1967. Chase E.M. Jewett A., Evans W. Values in Literature. Boston., 1965. Dyakonova N.Ya. An Anthology of English Literature. St.Peterburg,1978. Gritchuk M.A. English for students of literature. M.,1983. Holman Hugh. Harmon W. A. Handbook to Literature. London, 1992. Kearns G. English and Western Literature. USA Macmillan Publ., 1987. Ma Jinhai. (2006). Fighting between love and marriage. Hunan science technology institute journal 3, 77-78. Miles D. and Pooley R. Literature and life in England. New York., 1948. Muller G.H., Williams J. Introduction to literature. New York, 1985. Thornley G.C., Roberts G. An Outline of English literature. Longman, 1984. Volosova T.D., Hecker M.I., Rogoff V.V., English Literature. M., 1975. Aникин Г.В., Михальская Н.П. – История английской литературы. М., Высшая школа, 1975. 17. Аникст А.А. История английской литературы. М, Высшая школа, 1956. Азизов К., Каюмов О. Чет эл адабиёти тарихи. II-кисм. Ташкент, Зарубежная литература XIX века. Под ред. проф.Я.Н.Засурского. М. «Просвещение» 1976 Ступников И.В. Хрестоматия по английской литературе. Л. 1975. Download 270.19 Kb. Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: 
|