The term 'translation theory' (TT) is used as a synonym of several other terms accepted with a similar meaning in translat

12. Types of semantic correlation of English and Russian words. The semantic structure is determined by two factors: extralinguistic (how the language segments the outside world and embodies the results of its reflection by human mind in the meanings of lexical units) and intralinguistic(takes into account semantic links within the vocabulary system and thus determines semantic value of particular units.).
The semantic structure of lex.units is a complicated structure(two aspects of lexical meaning (denotational and connotational)). A.L. Bourak: 3 key types of relationship between word-senses in SL and TL: (1) inclusion (hyponymy), (2) partial inclusion and exclusion (cross-language synonyms) and (3) exclusion (antonymy).
3 types of semantic correlation: 1) full semantic coincidence, 2) partial semantic coincidence(den.comp.: a)intersection - hair; b)inclusion часы - watch, clock; con.comp.: bobby-полицейский-policeman-cop), 3) absence of semantic coincidence.
various causes of 3):
1)the difference in the systems of nominative means in English and Russian (cf. a fortnight - две недели, четырнадцать дней; by-line - строка в начале статьи (на которой помещается фамилия автора, художника или фотографа);
2)appearance of new coinages {self-cover - обложка из тиражной бумаги, drive-in - кинотеатр для автомобилистов, смотрящих фильмы, не покидая своих машин; «автокино»; ресторан для автомобилистов)'; 3)cultural words (Civil List - цивильный лист, самофинансирование - self-financing performance).

(13) Narrow – ready correspondences in bi-lingual dics (inside my room – у меня в комнате). Broad – used in regard to any means of textual T-n of a given unit that doesn’t coincide with a dic correspondence.(had fallen – набились).

In 1974 Ya.I. Retsker published his monograph "Teoriya perevoda i perevodcheskaya praktica"
Reg. Cor-s – 3 types: 1) equivalent 2) variant & contextual 3) correspondences resulting from T-n transformations.
1)refers to the sphere of lang, 2,3)to speech.
Komiss disagree – bc of mute points: 1) whether we take into account ways of establishing correspondences or the fact of their being registered in a bilingual dictionary 2)Variant correspondences also registered in parallel dictionaries so belong to lang too.3) Many correspondences that result from transformations than become dic-ry correspondences.

(15) equivalents- constant regular dic-ry correspondences which are used in T-n irrespective of context and are interchangeable with each other in all their uses. They are found mostly among – georg names, terms, some common nouns, not only in compound words and w-combis (dog-collar – ошейник).

Taking into account denotational component: