Fictional or autobiographical narrative writing—
Provides a minimally developed plot line, including characters and a setting.
Attempts to use strategies (dialogue, suspense, narrative action) but with minimal
effectiveness.
Response to literature writing—
Develops interpretations that demonstrate limited understanding of the text.
Provides few, if any, examples from the text to support interpretation.
Includes interpretations that lack accuracy or coherence of the literary work.
Persuasive writing—
Defends a position with little, if any evidence and may address the reader’s concerns, biases,
and expectations.
Summary writing—
Is characterized by substantial copying of key phrases and minimal paraphrasing.
1
The writing—
Addresses only one part of the writing prompt/topic/question.
Demonstrates no understanding of purpose and audience.
Lacks a point of view, focus, and organizational structure.
Does not use transitions to unify important ideas.
o Lacks central idea but may contain weakly related facts, details, and/or explanations.
o Includes no variety of sentence types and poor word choice
o Contains serious errors in the conventions of the English language (grammar,
punctuation, capitalization, spelling).
Fictional or autobiographical narrative writing—
Lacks a developed plot line.
Fails to use strategies (dialogue, suspense, narrative action).
Response to literature writing—
Demonstrate little understanding of the text.
Lacks examples from the text to support interpretation.
Lacks interpretation or may be a simple retelling of the story.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |