University of sunderland


Download 79.61 Kb.
bet5/5
Sana28.02.2023
Hajmi79.61 Kb.
#1236998
1   2   3   4   5
Bog'liq
AMAF UGB234 209212619 UMAROV AFZALBEK AA

Signed:


Date: 

Coursework Infringements – which can be dealt with at Stage 1

CW1 Academic Negligence

Penalty 1, 2 or 3  


CW2
Making available work to another student either intentionally or as a result of significant negligence which can be presented as another student’s work

Penalty 3 


CW3
Isolated use of quotes without the use of quotation marks and/or referencing 

FHEQ  
levels3 and 4 

Penalty 3 

All other levels  

Penalty 4A  

CW4
Submission for assessment of work submitted previously by the student
(Either at University of Sunderland or another institution) or work submitted for assessment that has previously been published elsewhere 

FHEQ levels 3 and 4  

Penalty 4A  

All other levels  

Penalty 4B  

CW5
Extensive use of quotes or close paraphrasing without the use of quotation marks and/or referencing, where the student has cited the plagiarised material in the bibliography.

FHEQ levels 3 and 4  

Penalty 4A 

All other levels  

Penalty 4B  

CW6
Lack of ethics approval 

FHEQ levels 3 and 4 

Penalty 4A  

All other levels  

Penalty 4B 

Penalties for Academic Misconduct at Stage 1


Offences should be mapped to the table below to determine the appropriate penalty  

  1. These penalties apply to substantiated first offences of academic misconduct; 

  2. A penalty for a second or subsequent substantiated incident of academic misconduct will normally be one penalty higher than that recommended 

  3. A single incident of academic misconduct may include more than 1 item,
    if committed within the same assessment period.

  4. Students who are studying for a Medical degree should refer to the relevant section within their Programme Handbook for information about academic misconduct penalties and how allegations will be dealt with 


Penalty
1



Attendance at University Study Skills or Academic Misconduct Awareness course

Penalty 2

A formally recorded warning kept on the student’s SITS record. The work should be marked but the mark may be reduced to reflect a student’s failure to address the assessment criteria in areas or sources and their citation. The student may be required to redo the work on pedagogic grounds



Penalty 3

A marking adjustment

Penalty 4a



Failure in the item of assessment, with reassessment right where permissible

The assessment component mark will be capped at the pass mark for the module

Penalty
4b



The entire module result will be capped at the pass mark for the module





SECTION B – TO BE COMPLETED BY THE INDEPENDENT REVIEWER 

Name of Independent Reviewer: 



Date of meeting: via Teams / telephone / in person 



Off Campus Reviewer’s comments on allegation: 

Student’s comments on allegation including any mitigating factors: 

Independent Reviewer’s recommendation to panel: 

I consider this misconduct to be serious, or I consider this misconduct to be less than serious but the student has not agreed that it be dealt with by means of a minor penalty, therefore the case has now been considered by me as Independent Reviewer within the Faculty. I have advised the student that the matter is now being submitted to the Academic Misconduct Panel and they will be invited to a formal hearing.

Student signature: 
Or email acknowledgement (append email) 



Interviewer signature: 

Date: 



Date: 






Version 5 September 2021 Page of



Download 79.61 Kb.

Do'stlaringiz bilan baham:
1   2   3   4   5




Ma'lumotlar bazasi mualliflik huquqi bilan himoyalangan ©fayllar.org 2024
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling