1. linguistic typology

2. HISTORICAL EVOLUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF FORMS OF ADDRESS TO MEN IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK LANGUAGES
In given section is considered the historian-evolutionary development of forms of the address in English and the Uzbek languages. And also on the basis of materials of English and Uzbek languages this section depicted the role and importance of forms of the address in oral speech. Development of forms of the address is reflected in this scientific work by the language periods under influence socially-historical factors.
Language is a process that can be compared to an ongoing process as some words become old by being replaced with new words. That gives us an opportunity to say that language is a living process. Every period in the history has its own literary language. But it does not give us the right to have an idea that the language of one period is totally different from the language of another period. Language is a dynamic process with its ongoing changes and in that process some of the language units change, some of them stay with no changes and enter the language of the next period. This shows that language is a two way process that is opposite to each other: the process in which new words enter the language and the process in which words become old and are not used in the language any more. This two way process is the law of dialectics.
In language learning process methods of synchronic and diachronic approaches play an important role. For example, in the study of the forms of address, the three factors are the important ones that one needs to give attention: 1) use of forms of address in the present time, 2) the historical development of the forms of address, 3) the development of dynamic approach to language.
Before we start talking about the historical development of the forms of address, it is worth stating what the forms of address are, and what the role of them is in communication. The forms of address are the language units directed towards listener from the side of the speaker and they do not make a part of the sentence from the point of syntax, but they contribute to the meaning of the whole sentence. With the help of them we can start, continue and finish conversation successfully. For example:
– In order to start the conversation: “How are you, my dear? said Albert cheerfully, putting aside the paper”;“Хуш кўрдик, бегим! – деди-да, унга ўнг елкасини тутди”;
– in order to continue the conversation: “Quarrel, sir! no, sir”; “Э, сўраманг, мулла тоға…”;
– in order to finish the conversation successfully: “Come, Sir, let’s away”; “Ундоқ бўлса менга руҳсат беринг, хазратим! – деди Қутлуғ Нигор хоним” .