A01 cohe4573 01 se fm. Qxd
8 8 T H E N U T S A N D B O L T S O F P R A G M A T I C S I N S T R U C T I O N
Download 1.95 Mb. Pdf ko'rish
|
1. Teaching and Learning pragmatics, where language and culture meet Norico Ishinara & Andrew D. Coren
1 8 8
T H E N U T S A N D B O L T S O F P R A G M A T I C S I N S T R U C T I O N F I G U R E 1 0 . 1 Journaling For general topics in L2 pragmatics: Hinkel, E. (2001) Building awareness and practical skills to facilitate cross- cultural communication. Judd, E. L. (1999) Some issues in the teaching of pragmatic competence. For an approach to L2 pragmatics instruction and concrete examples: Tanaka, K. (1997) Developing pragmatic competence: A learners-as- researchers approach. Eslami-Rasekh, Z. (2005) Raising the pragmatic awareness of language learners. For teaching pragmatics in foreign language contexts: Rose, K. (1994) Pragmatic consciousness-raising in an EFL context. Rose, K. R. (1999) Teachers and students learning about requests in Hong Kong. For learners’ culture and subjectivity in L2 pragmatics instruction: Kasper, G., and Rose, K. R. (2002) Chapter 8: Individual differences in L2 pragmatic development. LoCastro, V. (2003) Chapter 14: Learner subjectivity. The reflective prompts provided in Activity 2.1 in Chapter 2 may be useful in helping you to frame your reactions to the discussions presented in this book and in recording insights from your own experiences. Part I L E S S O N P L A N N I N G A N D T E A C H E R - L E D R E F L E C T I O N 1 8 9 prompts may help you reflect on your experience of learning and teaching pragmatics; Part II prompts include queries for a range of issues related to L2 pragmatics. If you have already participated in the activity in Chapter 2, it might be beneficial for you to revisit these prompts and your reflections back then. You may find that your knowledge and beliefs about pragmatics instruction have developed or become more refined. You may wish to reflect through writing on any new insights or queries you now have. You are also encouraged to reflect critically on your current practice and to identify an approach that could be applied to your own teaching and/or curriculum writing. You may also wish to discuss issues related to pragmatics instruc- tion that puzzle you or require further consideration. If possible, make this response journal interactive by working with a teacher colleague, a graduate student, a course instructor, or an administra- tor who shares an interest in this area. Writing can guide and facilitate your thinking, and engaging in dialogue with someone else (and with yourself) can further your ideas. 3 The process of professional development, such as gaining and internalizing new knowledge, connecting it to already existing knowledge and beliefs, and utilizing it for enhanced practice, requires a sustained and systematic effort, which can be supported through collegial collaboration. One way to support colleagues is by remaining open to their opinions and by facilitating their reflections through questions that you pose. Such questions would serve as a prompt for them to confirm what they had stated or to further develop their views. 4 Lesson-plan design This project represents a hands-on opportunity for teacher readers to design a pragmatics-focused lesson plan that can be directly applied to their own classrooms. Teacher participants are first asked to choose some aspect(s) of pragmatics to teach individually or in pairs, and to develop a lesson plan to improve learners’ pragmatics. In this project, you are encouraged to tie together various pragmatics-related issues discussed thus far, such as: levels of politeness, directness, formality, and appropriateness, intention and 3 Teacher learning can be viewed as largely influenced by a range of social activities that teachers engage in ( Johnson and Golombek 2003; Lee and Smagorinsky 2000; Vygotsky 1978). Teacher learning also is a language-mediated dialogic activity in which language functions as a primary tool for meaning construction (see also Chapter 6 for more on dialogic learning). 4 In Edge’s (2002) model of teachers’ cooperative learning, teachers use dialogue to mirror each other’s point by probing and asking clarification questions to facilitate articulation of the issue and refrain from giving suggestions. |
Ma'lumotlar bazasi mualliflik huquqi bilan himoyalangan ©fayllar.org 2024
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling