Actual problems of modern science, education and training

Literature review. The author writes these words about Etymological Dictionary of the Uzbek language: "there were those who sought to make an etymological dictionary of the Uzbek language, but in scientific work did not go beyond historical and etymological interpretation of certain words. Look at Dahr's kajraftor, it was my responsibility to draw up such a dictionary. I agreed to this work only after the firm claim of Academician Turabek Dolimov, the vice-rector for scientific work of TashDU: "an etymological dictionary has been compiled on other languages, including Russian, why is such a dictionary not compiled on the Uzbek language?! Of course it is necessary to draw up. May it be short, simple, but start working on it". Having studied a number of sources I began to, more or less, understand the historical evolution of the vocabulary of the Uzbek language, I dared to do this rewarding work. The result of the work done was reflected in four books published in 1997-1999 under the name "short Etymological Dictionary of the Uzbek language". It turns out that the first Etymological Dictionary of the Uzbek language dates back to the last years of the XX century. The author noted that he compiled all the articles in
the dictionary directly himself. He recruited other specialists in order to test the work he did. Various linguists gathered different parts of dictionary - professor I. M.Mirtozhiev compiled the letters u, e, o', g, d, j, k, t; professor M.Kadyrov made up the dictionary letters like a, i. Sh.Rahmatullaev, on the other hand, compared the articles of these to the ones he compiled, using them in the formation of a dictionary article.
Analysis. The vocabulary in the 2000 edition is compiled according to the "Explanatory Dictionary of the Uzbek language". Due to the fact that initially the Uzbek literary language was intended to provide an etymological explanation to the Turkic layer in the vocabulary, words from other languages in this Explanatory Dictionary were not covered, while words made on the basis of words from other languages were not included in the vocabulary. The author notes that a very large part of the Turkic words allocated after such discounts do not need an etymological explanation. Etymological explanation should be given to a part of the words, while today there is no way to give such an explanation. So, after the above restrictions, more than 2,400 words were covered in this dictionary. This amount can be enriched at the expense of the words sheva, at the expense of the words made by adding an adverb from another language to the Turkic word. Relying on the above information, it can be said that when creating a semantic extension for the combination of 80,000 words and phrases in the Uzbek language, not all of them have an etymological description. Because the etymological description in the semantic extension (like other footnotes) is obtained only from the source of information, that is, from the etymological dictionary of the Uzbek language.
It is noted that the terms of linguistics are practically not used, providing for the use of the dictionary by the general public, reviews are expressed in a popular way, in a concise manner. This gives us convenience when developing semantic extension annotations. Because the language Corpus or other information search tools are used by the general public. This necessitates simplifying the semantic extension style.