Actual problems of modern science, education and training

Conclusion 
According to what the paper has studied, we have following conclusions: 
 In Central Asian Countries including Uzbekistan enrollment rates for preschool 
education used be lower than other regions, therefore there is necessity in Central 
Asia to increase this rate. 
 Many nations have experienced challenges and changes in preschool education; 
therefore, Uzbekistan is also expected to face those kind of challenges.

---

 
http://khorezmscience.uz
182 
 In financing preschool education, some countries use different sources. In most 
cases, both state funds and parent fees implement the funding. In few of them 
even state funding is also divided sub funding sources such as federal and local. 
The paper develops some recommendations: 
 Taking into consideration the experience of the USA there should the perfect 
regulation and mechanism to finance the preschool education. Because in the 
USA, even there are different sources of financing the same program, they 
have different requirements. In Uzbekistan also, before financing they should 
set their requirements.
 In Russia, the money taken from state and parents is directed to separate 
expenses. It is regulated by legislative document, thus it is advisable to 
implement this policy in Uzbekistan. 
References 
[1]. Barnett, W. S., & Masse, L. (2003). Funding issues for early childhood education 
and care programs. In D. Cryer & R. M. Clifford (Eds.), Early childhood 
education & care in the USA (pp. 137-165). Baltimore: Brookes Publishing. 
[2]. Zigler, E., Gilliam, W. S., & Jones, S. M. (2006). A vision for universal preschool 
education. New York: Cambridge University Press. 
[3]. Barnett, W. S., Brown, K. C., Finn-Stevenson, M., & Henrich, C. (2007). From 
visions to systems of universal prekindergarten. In J. L. Aber, S. J. Bishop-Josef, 
S. M. Jones, K. T. McLearn, & D. A. Phillips (Eds.), Child development and 
social policy: Knowledge for action (pp. 113-128). Washington, DC: American 
Psychological Association 
[4]. Bowman, B. T. (2003). Family engagement and support. In D. Cryer & R. M. 
Clifford (Eds.), Early childhood education & care in the USA (pp. 119-136). 
Baltimore: Brookes Publishing. 
[5]. Kamerman, S. B., & Gatenio-Gabel, S. (2007). Early childhood education and care 
in the United States: An overview of the current policy picture. International 
Journal of Child Care and Education Policy, 1, 23-34. 

---

 
http://khorezmscience.uz
183 
[6]. Barnett, W. S., & Yarosz, D. J. (2007). Who goes to preschool and why does it 
matter? (Preschool Policy Brief No. 15). New Brunswick, NJ: National Institute 
for Early Education Research, Rutgers University. 
[7]. Anne West (2006). The pre-school education market in England from 1997: 
quality, availability, affordability and equity. Oxford Review of Education Vol. 
32, No. 3, July 2006, pp. 283–301
[8]. Sure Start (2004a) About Sure Start (London, Sure Start). 
[9]. Lewis, J. (2003) Developing early years childcare in England, 1997–2002: the 
choices for (working) mothers, Social Policy and Administration, 37(3), 219–
238. 
[10]. Barnett, W. S., & Masse, L. (2003). Funding issues for early childhood education 
and care programs. In D. Cryer & R. M. Clifford (Eds.), Early childhood 
education & care in the USA (pp. 137-165). Baltimore: Brookes Publishing. 
[11]. Ibid W. S., & Masse, L.