0
.1
.2
.3
.4
.5
.6
.7
.8
.9
1
Note. Only those types with mean > .1
are included in this figure
Figure 10. Mean use of collocation tokens in the essay data - Group 2
0
.1
.2
.3
.4
.5
.6
.7
.8
.9
Note. Only those types with mean > .1 are included in this figure
Figure 11. Mean use of collocation tokens in the essay data - Group 3
286
4.2.2.1.5 Summary of the Results for the Essay Data
The results of the Friedman repeated measures for the essay data
support Hypothesis 2 that there are group-specific
patterns in the development
of collocational knowledge. For Group 1, Types 26.
SVc, 29.
Adjective Noun, and
11.
SV(O) Prep O were used significantly more than the other types of
collocation. For Group 2, Types 26.
SVc, 29.
Adjective Noun, 12.
SV to Inf, and
11.
SV(O) Prep O were used significantly more than the other types.
For Group
3, Types 26.
SVc, 13.
SV Inf, and 12
SV to Inf were used significantly more than
the other types. These results suggest that for each
group there are certain
types that are used more than others, indicating
that subjects in each group
prefer to use, and are more accurate in using, specific types of collocation.
These results also indicate the existence of group-specific
patterns in the
acquisition of collocation, as was predicted by Hypothesis 2.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: