34
Hypothesis Two
It is hypothesized that bilingual children who had a
traumatic brain injury will
have greater splits between their VIQ and PIQ’s (with PIQ being the higher value)
compared to monolingual children who have incurred a traumatic brain injury when
controlling for age when TBI was obtained. Analyses included
a within-between subjects
mixed design ANCOVA measuring the repeated measures for Time 1 (3 month) and
Time 2 (12 month) with the dependent variables of VIQ and PIQ and the between
subjects variable of monolingual/bilingual while controlling for age when TBI occurred.
No significant main effects were found when comparing bilingual’s
VIQ and PIQ
scores at Time 1 and Time 2 to monolingual VIQ and PIQ scores at Time 1 and Time 2
(
p’s > .05) (see table 3).
Table 3
.
ANCOVA of Bilingual/Monolingual IQ Scores Across Time
Sources of
Variation
SS Df MS F
P-Value
IQ Time 1
1.78
1
1.78
0.05
0.82
IQ Time 2
45.79
1
45.79
0.67
0.43
Age 162.18 1 162.18
0.26 0.62
Language
Spoken
5.01 1 5.01
0.01
0.93
However, a significant interaction was present between bilingual/monolingual and
IQ at Time 2 (12 month)
F(1, 15) = 4.83,
p = 0.04, r = 0.54. This
indicates that the effect
on IQ at the 12 month evaluation was impacted by language (monolingual vs bilingual)
35
status. Monolinguals appear to have a greater difference between their VIQ (M = 89.11,
SE = 4.09) and PIQ (M = 100.39, SE = 4.65) at their 12 month evaluation compared to
the difference evident in bilinguals’ VIQ (M= 92.89, SE = 4.09) and PIQ (M = 95.56, SE
= 4.65). Monolinguals appear to have significantly lower VIQ’s compared to their PIQ’s
while bilinguals do not at Time 2 (See Fig. 17).
Figure 17. IQ of Monolingual and Bilingual children at 12
Month Evaluation
36
There was an interaction approaching significance between age of TBI acquisition
and IQ score at Time 2 (12 month)
F(1, 15) = 3.63,
p = 0.08, r = 0.43.
The effect is linear
suggesting the older the individual the higher their IQ scores should be.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: