English for
Paul: Can I come in first on this? Moderator
Download 2.06 Mb. Pdf ko'rish
|
English for Academics Teachers Guide Book 2
- Bu sahifa navigatsiya:
- Moderator
Paul: Can I come in first on this?
Moderator: Sure, Paul. Paul: I believe that a publication should be theoretically and methodologically sound. It has to be based on solid research and structured investigation. And the research the article is based on should be original. Review articles are appropriate, but research publications are more welcome. Dan: That’s exactly how I see it. A publication that is accepted is likely to be relevant and beneficial to the academic community. Besides that, the article has to be well structured and clearly written. The use of technical terms has to be accurate and precise. Moderator: Thank you, Paul and Dan, for such detailed explanations. Coming back to the issue of publishing versus teaching, what other problems does this pressure to publish cause? Dan? Dan: Really, the ‘publish-or-perish’ system causes a lot of stress among not only young academics, but also more established scholars. Now many institutions consider your article as worthy only if it is published in a journal with a high citation index. Moderator: Sorry, could I just check, does a citation index illustrate how often a publication is cited, and the citation index, in its turn, does it affect a journal’s impact factor? Dan: Quite right. But low impact factors do not necessarily mean a journal is of lower quality. It may concentrate on a very specific subject, for instance. Sadly, if all academics limit their publications to journals with high impact factors, there will be neither choice nor diversity. Moderator: A rather sad perspective. Well, Ann, what’s your view on this? 9 Suggested answers Criteria the arguments fail to meet: B Some parts are disconnected: the point about having larger bodies of data today is not connected with anything else. There are some contradictory points: the speaker says the pressure to publish quickly is the reason for the low quality of research results, but then says that modern technology helps us to process data quickly. C The argument does not have a conclusion. The tone is emotional. Download 2.06 Mb. Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |
Ma'lumotlar bazasi mualliflik huquqi bilan himoyalangan ©fayllar.org 2024
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling