English for Academics Book 2 Teacher’s Guide
© Cambridge University Press and British Council Russia 2015
www.cambridge.org/elt/english-for-academics
PHOTOCOPIABLE
16
Lesson 3
Module 1
Optional: You may want to ask learners to correct the false
statements. You could also ask
them to identify what the
participants are doing in these statements. Ask learners to
work in pairs and think of the language that can be used
for
each of the functions, and write it on the board.
Answers
1 introducing the participants 2 disagreeing 3 interrupting
4 taking the initiative 5, 6 agreeing/disagreeing
7 drawing a conclusion
Audioscript
16
Moderator: Welcome to our round-table discussion. The topic
of our talk is ‘Publish or Perish’,
so we are going to discuss
publishing matters in academia. Our participants today are
Professor Ann Midway, Senior Researcher Dan Corner, and
Dean Paul Waine. The first question is, why publish? Over to
you, Ann.
Ann: Thank you. Writing scholarly
publications is a crucial
aspect of academic work … In short, publishing is crucial for
research, your career, your own satisfaction.
Moderator: Dan, what’s your view on this?
Dan: I couldn’t agree more. All around
the world universities are
aspiring to higher international rankings, because university
funding depends on research performance, and research
performance is evaluated by the quality of publications.
Nonetheless, some argue that the publish-or-perish
imperative shifts the emphasis away from real teaching.
Moderator: Sorry to interrupt you, but we’re going to discuss
that issue later. The next question we have is, what is a good
scholarly publication?
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: