Guide to Citizens’ Rights and Responsibilities
G O V E R N M E N T S O F T H E W O R L D
Download 4.77 Kb. Pdf ko'rish
|
- Bu sahifa navigatsiya:
- G O V E R N M E N T S O F T H E W O R L D J a m a i c a republic
- See also: Caribbean Region; Constitutional Monarchy; Democracy; Parliamentary Systems. B I B L I O G R A P H Y
- G O V E R N M E N T S O F T H E W O R L D 7 J a m a i c a Japan
- H I S T O R I C A L D E V E L O P M E N T O F L AW A N D G O V E R N M E N T
- G O V E R N M E N T S O F T H E W O R L D J a p a n oligarchy
- S T R U C T U R E O F L AW A N D G O V E R N M E N T I N J A PA N
- G O V E R N M E N T S O F T H E W O R L D 9 J a p a n promulgation
- Mt. Fuji 12,388 ft. 3776 m. Erimo Misaki Shiretoko Misaki Kamui Misaki
- Hedo Misaki Kasari Saki HIDAKA SAMMYAKU Asahi Dake 7,513 ft. 2290 m.
- Tanega Shima Yaku Shima N A N SE I SH
- Okhjotsk La Perouse Strait P A C I F I C O C E A N East China Sea
- Fukuoka Hiroshima Kobe Nagoya Yokohama Sapporo Hachinohe Ishinomaki Kushiro Kyoto
- JAPAN 300 Miles 0 0 300 Kilometers 100 200 100 200 Sh in a n
- G O V E R N M E N T S O F T H E W O R L D J a p a n bloc
G O V E R N M E N T S O F T H E W O R L D 5 J a m a i c a per capita: for each person, especially for each person living in an area or country authoritarianism: the domination of the state or its leader over individuals ■ ■ ■ Seaga. Throughout the 1990s Seaga faced internal threats to his dominance of the party and was able to defeat them all, though at a cost. In part, the price was the loss of some of the most experienced and respected cadres along with their support base. The most outstanding case was that of Deputy Leader Bruce Golding (b. 1947), who left the party to form the National Democratic Movement (NDM) in 1996. Without winning any seats, the NDM contested the 1997 and 2002 elections. However, many felt that it was able to siphon off sufficient votes from the JLP to allow for two PNP victories. After the 2002 elections, Golding returned to the JLP, although it was still led by Edward Seaga. T H E F U T U R E As of early 2005, Jamaican politics were poised at a moment of succession. P. J. Patterson indicated that he would retire before the next general election in 2007. Bruce Golding, after a difficult transition period, had finally taken over from Edward Seaga as leader of the JLP. Beyond this, the main debates in politics centered on ways to reform the more-than-forty-year-old constitution. Efforts were in train to make Jamaica a republic and end the archaic, though largely ceremonial relationship with the British Crown. There also was a desire to strengthen checks and balances through the introduction of a presidential type system, though there was no indication of a national consensus on this. There also were strong debates around the character and practice of the judicial system. The Caribbean Court of Justice (CCJ), a multinational court for the countries of the Anglophone Caribbean, which is to replace the British Privy Council as the final court of appeal, was soon to be launched. In early 2005, the Privy Council itself judged that the final appellate functions of the court could not be made legal unless they were deeply entrenched, requiring, at minimum, a consensus between the government and opposition parties. Unless such a consensus is forged, the matter might have to be taken to a national refer- endum. Other legal issues surrounded the slow and encumbered functioning of the judicial system and continued attempts to hold the police legally 6 G O V E R N M E N T S O F T H E W O R L D J a m a i c a republic: a form of democratic government in which decisions are made by elected repre- sentatives of the people ■ ■ ■ T H E C A R I B B E A N C O U R T O F J U S T I C E The Caribbean Court of Justice (CCJ) is a regional judicial body that replaced the Judicial Committee of the British Privy Council as a court of last resort for the member states of the Caribbean Community and the Common Market (CARICOM). The creation of a Caribbean court of appeal was first proposed in 1970 and received further support when the Treaty of Chaguaramas established CARICOM in 1973. After an agree- ment to form the CCJ was ratified by thirteen Caribbean states in 2002, the Court was formally inaugurated on April 16, 2005. Nations participating in the CCJ include Antigua–Barbuda, Barbados, Belize, Dominica, Grenada, Guyana, Jamaica, Montserrat, St. Kitts–Nevis, St. Lucia, St. Vincent, Suriname, and Trinidad and Tobago. The seat of the CCJ is in Port-of-Spain, Trinidad and Tobago; however, the Court may sit in the territory of any member state. The CCJ is unique among international courts in that it is a hybrid court; that is, it serves as an original court to settle dis- putes related to applications of the CARICOM treaty as well as an appellate court in civil and criminal matters. The Court’s hybrid structure is expected to improve the administration of jus- tice in the Caribbean countries by reinforcing their independ- ence from the British legal system as well as reducing distance and travel costs. ■ ■ ■ appellate: a court having jurisdiction to review the findings of lower courts accountable in instances of alleged extrajudicial killings. The question of how to combat corruption—particularly drug-related corruption—remained high on the national agenda. In the economy, the primary issue, and indeed the dominant one for the past three decades, remained the fraught and elusive objective of initiating a path of economic growth with a degree of equity that would allow a modicum of prosperity for the majority of the population. See also: Caribbean Region; Constitutional Monarchy; Democracy; Parliamentary Systems. B I B L I O G R A P H Y Combating Corruption in Jamaica: A Citizen’s Guide. Atlanta, GA: The Carter Center, 1999. Economic and Social Survey of Jamaica, 2003. Kingston, Jamaica: Planning Institute of Jamaica, 2004. Figueroa, Mark, and Amanda Sives. “Homogenous Voting, Electoral Manipulation and the ‘Garrison’ Process in Post-Independence Jamaica.” Journal of Commonwealth and Comparative Politics 40, no. 1 (March 2002). Henke, Holger. Between Self-Determination and Dependency: Jamaica’s Foreign Relations 1972–1989. Barbados: The University of the West Indies Press, 2000. Human Development Report 2003. New York and Oxford, UK: United Nations Development Programme and Oxford University Press, 2003. The Jamaica (Constitution) Order in Council 1962. Kingston, Jamaica: The Jamaica Observer, 1999. Jamaica: Killings and Violence by Police: How Many More Victims?. London: Amnesty International, 2001. Manley, Michael. Jamaica: Struggle in the Periphery. London: Third World Media in Association with Writers and Readers Publishing Cooperative Society, 1982. Munroe, Trevor. The Politics of Constitutional Decolonization: Jamaica 1944 –1962. Kingston, Jamaica: Institute of Social and Economic Research, 1983. Munroe, Trevor. Renewing Democracy into the Millennium: The Jamaican Experience in Perspective. Barbados: The Press University of the West Indies, 1999. Payne, Anthony. Politics in Jamaica, revised ed. Kingston, Jamaica: Ian Randle Publishers, 1994. Post, Ken. Arise Ye Starvelings: The Jamaican Labor Rebellion of 1938 and its Aftermath. The Hague, the Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff, 1978. Senior, Olive. Encyclopedia of Jamaican Heritage. Red Hills, Jamaica: Twin Guinep Publishers, 2003. Sherlock, Philip, and Hazel Bennett. The Story of the Jamaican People. Princeton, NJ: Marcus Wiener Publishers, 1998. Stephens, Evelyne Huber, and John D. Stephens. Democratic Socialism in Jamaica: The Political Movement and Social Transformation in Dependent Capitalism. Houndmills, UK: Macmillan, 1986. Stone, Carl. Democracy and Clientelism in Jamaica. New York: Transaction Books, 1983. Brian W. Meeks G O V E R N M E N T S O F T H E W O R L D 7 J a m a i c a Japan Japan is a fascinating country rich in history, culture, and tradition. Formed from a scenic chain of volcanic islands off the coast of Asia, Japan is roughly the size of the U.S. state of California. Because of its mountainous terrain, most of Japan’s approximately 128 million residents live along the coast, particularly in the urban corridor between Tokyo and Kobe, where 45 percent of the popula- tion is packed into 17 percent of the land area. Japan stands as a modern industrial, economic, and political superpower. Its rapid ascension to power, including its recovery from the ashes of World War II (1939–1945), provides one of the twentieth century’s most remarkable stories. Consequently, the Japanese enjoy a high standard of living and amenities typical of first-world nations. Japan’s per capita gross domestic product dwarfs most other nations, and its economy ranks among the top three countries in the world. Japan’s prosperity has thwarted major crime and contributed to long life expectancies. One major obstacle facing Japan is a rapidly aging population. By 2030, 28 percent of Japan’s population is expected to be sixty-five years of age or older. The Japanese also benefit from extensive freedoms and fundamental rights. Their political and civil rights have consistently ranked near the top of advanced industrial societies. H I S T O R I C A L D E V E L O P M E N T O F L AW A N D G O V E R N M E N T The story of Japan and its government extends well beyond the past century. Japan’s government is traceable to the Shinto legend recorded in the Chronicles of Japan (Nihon Shoki) and Record of Ancient Things (Kojiki). Authored around C . E . 720, these records mythically describe how two Shinto deities, Izanagi and Izanami, dipped their Heavenly Jeweled Spear into the sea to create Onokorojima Isle and then descended on the island to create the other Japanese islands. One of their descendants, Ninigi no Mikoto, was later bestowed with the sovereign right to rule Japan as represented by the Imperial Regalia (sacred mirror, stone, and jewels). The Regalia were ultimately conferred on Jimmu Tenno, Japan’s first emperor, and subsequently passed down to each emperor in an unbroken chain. Separating reality from myth may prove difficult, but it is not difficult to recognize Japan’s unbroken history or the profound influence of Shintoism and other reli- gious tenets on Japanese law and government. Prior to the mid-nineteenth century, shoguns and daimyo lords ruled Japan in loose feudal arrangements. The emperor symbolically stood in the background as the divine head of government, while the shoguns and daimyo ruled within a “loyalty pyramid” consisting of subject, emperor, and the family patriarch, village head, daimyo, or shogun. This governance system was decentralized , but the central government exercised power over the local units when necessary. The first political revolution in Japan’s law and government began in 1853 when Commodore Matthew Perry’s (1794–1858) black warships arrived from the United States and forced Japan to open its shuttered society. This foreign interven- tion and the desire to combat further intrusion enabled the Meiji (“enlightened ones”) oligarchy to take control of Japan and form a centralized government, thus shifting power from the shoguns to the emperor. By 1868, the Meiji government had enacted a constitution. By 1900, the legal system had been further revolution- ized through the creation of a parliament and comprehensive system of European- style administrative, commercial, and civil codes. This political revolution not only propelled Japan’s rapid modernization , but it also cultivated its militarism and conquest of Asia and the Pacific before the end of World War II. 8 G O V E R N M E N T S O F T H E W O R L D J a p a n oligarchy: government by a few or an elite ruling class, whose policies are often not in the public interest modernization: the act of incorporating new ideas or technology militarism: pertaining to the military or the culture of the military, or aggressive military preparation decentralize: to move power from a central authority to multiple periphery government branches or agencies ■ ■ ■ S T R U C T U R E O F L AW A N D G O V E R N M E N T I N J A PA N Disillusioned and industrially obliterated after World War II, Japan faced its second political revolution at the hands of the Supreme Commander of the Allied Powers (SCAP). Directed by the United States, SCAP set about democratizing and demilitarizing Japan through a new constitution and mod- ified legal code system. SCAP drafted a new constitution modeled after the U.S. version, only with greater rights and powers. The new Constitution of Japan was promulgated on November 3, 1946, and took effect on May 3, 1947. By its own terms, the constitution is the supreme law of Japan. Reflecting the desires of the Japanese people and its U.S. drafters, the constitution focuses on democratic concepts such as popular sovereignty, separation of powers, respect for fundamental human rights, a parliamentary legislature, and an authoritative judiciary. It also promotes pacifism and peace through a “renunciation of war” clause. Ironically, this clause has engendered much debate and contention within Japan that continued into the early twenty-first century. Nonetheless, the constitution has never been amended, and its revolutionary changes have facili- tated great peace and prosperity in Japan. The constitution bases the government on a ceremonial emperor and three equal branches of government: legislative, executive, and judicial. Unlike the Meiji constitution, which recognized the absolute power of the emperor, the new G O V E R N M E N T S O F T H E W O R L D 9 J a p a n promulgation: an official declaration, espe- cially that a law can start being enforced ■ ■ ■ pacifism: the belief that war and violence are inferior methods of conflict resolution, to be avoided absolute: complete, pure, free from restric- tion or limitation Mt. Fuji 12,388 ft. 3776 m. Erimo Misaki Shiretoko Misaki Kamui Misaki Henashi Zaki Suzu Misaki Nojima Zaki Shiono Misaki Hinomi Saki Sata Misaki Hedo Misaki Kasari Saki HIDAKA SAMMYAKU Asahi Dake 7,513 ft. 2290 m. (R Y U K Y U IS LA N D S) SHIKOKU Sado Izu Shichito Tsushima OKINAWA Tokuno Shima Okino Erabu Shima KYUSHU ¯ ¯ HOKKAIDO ¯ HONSHU ¯ ¯ Okushiri To Rishiri To ¯ Rebun To ¯ Oki Gunto¯ Hachijo Jima ¯ Mikura Jima Dogo ¯ Osumi Shoto ¯ ¯ Tanega Shima Yaku Shima N A N SE I SH O T O ¯ Amami o Shima ¯ S e a o f J a p a n Sea of Okhjotsk La Perouse Strait P A C I F I C O C E A N East China Sea Towada Ko Biwa Ko Toyama Wan Wakasa Wan Ish inom aki Wan Ise Wan B u n go Su id o¯ K ii S u id o¯ Kagoshima Nagasaki Kumamoto Miyazaki Matsuyama Okayama Matsue Wakayama Gifu Hamamatsu Shizuoka Utsunomiya Kanazawa Komatsu Niigata Fukushima Sendai Himeji Asahikawa Matsumae Haboro Nemuro Mombetsu Hakodate Aomori Morioka Mutsu Akita Tsuruoka Nagano Naha Kawasaki Fukuoka Hiroshima Kobe Nagoya Yokohama Sapporo Hachinohe Ishinomaki Kushiro Kyoto Kitakyushu Tokyo Osaka NORTH KOREA C H I N A SOUTH KOREA W S N E Japan JAPAN 300 Miles 0 0 300 Kilometers 100 200 100 200 Sh in a n o (MAP BY MARYLAND CARTOGRAPHICS/ THE GALE GROUP) constitution sets forth a limited constitutional monarchy with a representative parliament. Under the constitution, the emperor stands as the “symbol of the State and unity of the people” (Office of the Prime Minister, n.d., Article 1) and attends to various ceremonial duties. Emperor Akihito (b. 1933) assumed the throne as the 125th Emperor of Japan on January 7, 1989. He does not wield significant political influence or legal power, however. Legislative authority is vested in the diet, which serves as the highest and only lawmaking body of the state. The diet is a bicameral parliamentary body elected directly by voters who are at least twenty years old. Comprised of the House of Representatives (Lower House) and House of Councillors (Upper House), the diet proposes, debates, and enacts legislation. The Lower House consists of 480 members serving four-year terms (absent prior dissolution), of which 300 members represent single-seat constituencies and 180 members represent proportionate regional blocs . The Upper House consists of 247 mem- bers serving six-year terms, of which 149 members represent multiseat con- stituencies and 98 represent proportional constituencies. Half of the Upper House faces election every three years. The diet convenes 150-day ordinary sessions unless extended by vote or called into extraordinary session by the cabinet. In addition to legislating, the diet approves the national budget, ratifies treaties, and initiates constitutional amendments. Although both houses theoretically share equal power, the Lower House holds veto power over the Upper House in disagreements about legisla- tion, treaties, and designation of the prime minister. This has led some com- mentators to recommend abandoning the Upper House. Executive power is vested in the cabinet pursuant to the constitution. The prime minister and other ministers of state constitute the cabinet. The diet des- ignates the prime minister based on the consensus of the diet’s majority party or ruling coalition. The prime minister is charged with submitting legislation, reporting national and international affairs to the diet, and overseeing the administrative branches. As of July 2004, Junichiro Koizumi ( b. 1942) had served for over three years as prime minister and president of the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), the largest party in the ruling coalition. The prime minister appoints and dismisses ministers of state, with the caveat that the majority of the ministers must come from the diet. In January 2001, the existing ministries and ministry-level agencies were consolidated into twelve organizations. Each ministry has one minister, two senior vice ministers, and three parliamentary secretaries, many of whom also serve as diet members. In 2001, the Cabinet Office was also created to oversee cabinet plans and provide comprehensive policy coordination, particularly in the areas of economics, science and technology, central disaster management, and gender equality. The cabinet has traditionally possessed exceptional power. The cabinet issues regulations and orders that apply to laws passed by the diet. The cabinet also drafts legislation, prepares the national budget, and manages domestic and external affairs. To effectively fulfill its duties, the cabinet delegates many tasks to various underlying administrative organs and committees within the central government. These administrative arms comprise the bureaucracy. Japan is notorious for its strong bureaucracy. With their technical expertise and access to vital information, Japanese bureaucrats have held enormous power over the past fifty years, particularly compared to civil servants in other democratic countries. Bureaucrats are selected based on national public servant examinations. Prestige and stability draw many of the brightest minds into the bureaucracy. Dating back to the Meiji period, the bureaucrats have maintained a sense of 10 G O V E R N M E N T S O F T H E W O R L D J a p a n bloc: a group of countries or individuals working toward a common goal, usually within a convention or other political body ■ ■ ■ delegate: to assign power to another, or, one who represents another confidence, power, and importance in society. They tend to serve the govern- ment’s interests as opposed to the will of the people. Bureaucratic positions are not political appointments. In fact, stringent civil service laws and traditions against political interference generally protect bureaucrats. At the end of fiscal 2002, about 1.1 million national public servants worked in the central government. The bureaucracy often exercises its power over private entities through informal administrative guidance or gyosei shido. Informal guidance can take the form of instructions, warnings, cautions, recommendations, requests, or advice. In strict legal terms, the private party receiving the administrative guid- ance cannot be compelled to abide by this guidance. Compliance is voluntary, but failure to comply could result in import quotas on necessary materials, the denial of government financing, restrictions on construction permits and city services, or similar restrictions. The bureaucracy continued to maintain significant control in the early twenty-first century. However, a stagnant economy and electoral volatility produced uncertainty and a sense that policy-making processes require reform. Also, the bureaucracy’s competent and incorruptible image had been irreparably damaged since the early 1990s because of policy failures, bureau- cratic scandals involving kickbacks, and public health fiascos related to HIV- tainted blood and mad-cow disease. The judicial system is modeled primarily after the German and French civil code systems. The major laws are compiled into a six-volume collection known as the Roppo Zensho. These laws include the constitution and civil, commercial, and criminal codes, as well as codes of civil and criminal procedure. Japanese attor- neys rely on the codes to analyze and respond to legal issues. Notwithstanding these codes, Japan does maintain a distinct common-law influence in its law and court system as a result of the U.S.-drafted constitution and the influence of U.S. law on the judicial system. The court system is responsible for reviewing civil, administrative, and crimi- nal disputes. Although Japanese courts may review the constitutionality of legislative acts, proactive remedies are rarely granted even when a statute is deemed unconstitutional. Generally, litigants have access to an initial trial and two possible appeals within the five-tier court structure. The number of courts at each level is as follows: summary courts (575), family courts (50), district courts (50), high courts (8), and the Supreme Court. The summary and family courts are lim- ited to small claims and family matters, respectively. The Supreme Court is the court of last resort. Fifteen justices sit on the Supreme Court, ten of whom must be judges, prosecutors, lawyers, or law professors. The remaining five judges need not be jurists . The chief justice is designated by the cabinet and appointed by the emperor. This gives prestige to the judiciary that is comparable to the other branches of government. It is important to note that, unlike the federal and state court systems in the United States, Japan maintains a single national court system. Litigation rates are relatively low in Japan in part due to an undersized pool of judges and trial attorneys. As of April 2003, there were approximately 3,139 judges and assistant judges. Before 2004, only 1,200 applicants passed the national bar examination each year (for a passage rate of 3%). The lack of judges and lawyers causes significant court backlogs and hinders litigants seeking to enforce their rights. Download 4.77 Kb. Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |
Ma'lumotlar bazasi mualliflik huquqi bilan himoyalangan ©fayllar.org 2024
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling