Handbook of psychology volume 7 educational psychology

98

Metacognition and Learning

G. Miller, & M. Pressley (Eds.), Cognitive strategy research:

From basic research to educational applications (pp. 133–154).

New York: Springer-Verlag.

Durst, R. K. (1989). Monitoring processes in analytic and summary

writing. Written Communication, 6, 340–363.

El-Hindi, A. E. (1997). Connecting reading and writing: College

learners’ metacognitive awareness. Journal of Developmental

Education, 21, 10–18.

Elliott-Faust, D. J., & Pressley, M. (1986). How to teach comparison

processing to increase children’s short- and long-term listening

comprehension monitoring. Journal of Educational Psychology,

78, 27–33.

Ellis, D., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2001). Enhancing self-monitoring

during self-regulated learning of speech. In H. Hartman (Ed.),

Metacognition in learning and instruction: Theory, research and

practice (pp. 205–228). Norwell, MA: Kluwer.

Englert, C. S., & Hiebert, E. H. (1984). Children’s developing

awareness of text structures in expository materials. Journal of

Educational Psychology, 76, 65–74.

Englert, C. S., Raphael, T. E., Anderson, L. M., Anthony, H. M., &

Stevens, D. D. (1991). Making strategies and self-talk visible:

Writing instruction in regular and special education classrooms.

American Educational Research Journal, 28, 337–372.

Englert, C. S., Raphael, T. E., Fear, K. L., & Anderson, L. M. (1988).

Students’ metacognitive knowledge about how to write informa-

tional texts. Learning Disability Quarterly, 11, 18–46.

Englert, C. S., Stewart, S. R., & Hiebert, E. H. (1988). Young writ-

ers’ use of text structure in expository text generation. Journal of

Educational Psychology, 80, 143–151.

Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (1996). The expert learner: Strategic,

self-regulated, and reflective. Instructional Science, 24, 1–24.

Everson, H. T., & Tobias, S. (2001). The ability to estimate knowl-

edge and performance in college: A metacognitive analysis. In

H. Hartman (Ed.), Metacognition in learning and instruction:

Theory, research and practice (pp. 69–83). Norwell, MA:

Kluwer.

Fitzgerald, J., & Teasley, A. B. (1986). Effects of instruction in nar-

rative structure on children’s writing. Journal of Educational

Psychology, 78, 424–432.

Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In

L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231–235).

Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring:

A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American

Psychologist, 34, 906–911.

Flavell, J. H. (1981). Cognitive monitoring. In W. P. Dickson (Ed.),

Children’s oral communication skills (pp. 35–60). New York:

Academic Press.

Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of

writing. College Composition and Communication, 32, 365–

387.

Francis, W. S. (1999). Cognitive integration of language and

memory in bilinguals: Semantic representation. Psychological

Bulletin, 125, 193–222.

Fusco, E., & Fountain, G. (1992). Reflective teacher, reflective

learner. In A. L. Costa, J. Bellanca, & R. Fogarty (Eds.), If minds

matter: A foreward to the future (Vol. 1, pp. 239–255). Palatine,

IL: Skylight. 

Garcia, G. E., Jimenez, R. T., & Pearson, P. D. (1998). Metacogni-

tion, childhood bilingualism, and reading. In D. J. Hacker,

J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in edu-

cational theory and practice (pp. 193–219). Mahwah, NJ:

Erlbaum.

Garner, R. (1980). Monitoring of understanding: An investigation of

good and poor readers’ awareness of induced miscomprehension

of text. Journal of Reading Behavior, 12, 55–63.

Garner, R. (1987). Metacognition and reading comprehension.

Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Garner, R. (1988). Verbal-report data on cognitive and metacogni-

tive strategies. In Learning and study strategies: Issues in as-

sessment, instruction, and evaluation (pp. 63–76). San Diego,

CA: Academic Press. 

Garner, R., & Alexander, P. A. (1989). Metacognition: Answered and

unanswered questions. Educational Psychologist, 24, 143–158.

Garner, R., & Kraus, C. (1981-1982). Good and poor comprehender

differences in knowing and regulating reading behaviors. Educa-

tional Research Quarterly, 6, 5–12.

Garner, R., & Reis, R. (1981). Monitoring and resolving compre-

hension obstacles: An investigation of spontaneous text look-

backs among upper-grade good and poor readers. Reading

Research Quarterly, 16, 569–582.

Ghatala, E. S., Levin, J. R., Foorman, B. R., & Pressley, M. (1989).

Improving children’s regulation of their reading PREP time.

Contemporary Educational Psychology, 14, 49–66.

Glenberg, A. M., & Epstein, W. (1985). Calibration of comprehen-

sion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, &

Cognition, 11, 702–718.

Glenberg, A. M., Wilkinson, A. C., & Epstein, W. (1982). The illu-

sion of knowing: Failure in the self-assessment of comprehen-

sion. Memory & Cognition, 10, 597–602.

Goh, C. (1997). Metacognitive awareness and second language

listeners. ELT Journal, 51, 361–369.

Gourgey, A. F. (2001). Metacognition in basic skills instruction. In H.

Hartman (Ed.), Metacognition in learning and instruction: The-

ory, research and practice (pp. 17–32). Norwell, MA: Kluwer.

Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (1989a). Componential analysis of cog-

nitive strategy instruction: Effects on learning disabled students’

composition and self-efficacy. Journal of Educational Psychol-

ogy, 81, 353–361.

Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (1989b). Improving learning disabled

students’ skills at composing essays: Self-instructional strategy

training. Exceptional Children, 56, 201–214.

References

99

Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (1994). The role and development of

self-regulation in the writing process. In D. H. Schunk & B. J.

Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and perfor-

mance: Issues and educational applications (pp. 203–228).

Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Grice, D. H. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L.

Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics (Vol. 3, pp. 41–58). New

York: Academic Press.

Hacker, D. J. (1998a). Definitions and empirical foundations. In

D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacogni-

tion in educational theory and practice (pp. 1–23). Mahwah, NJ:

Erlbaum.

Hacker, D. J. (1998b). Self-regulated comprehension during normal

reading. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.),

Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 165–

191). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. 

Hacker, D. J., Dunlosky, J., & Graesser, A. C. (Eds.). (1998).

Metacognition in educational theory and practice. Mahwah, NJ:

Erlbaum.

Hadwin, A. F., Winne, P. H., Stockley, D. B., Nesbit, J. C., &

Woszczyna, C. (2001). Context moderates students’ self-reports

about how they study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93,

477–487.

Harris, P. L., Kruithof, A., Terwogt, M. M., & Visser, T. (1981).

Children’s detection and awareness of textual anomaly. Journal

of Experimental Child Psychology, 31, 212–230.

Hartman, H. (Ed.). (2001a). Metacognition in learning and instruc-

tion: Theory, research and practice. Norwell, MA: Kluwer.

Hartman, H. (2001b). Teaching metacognitively. In H. Hartman

(Ed.), Metacognition in learning and instruction: Theory,

research and practice (149–172). Norwell, MA: Kluwer.

Jacobs, J. E., & Paris, S. G. (1987). Children’s metacognition about

reading: Issues in definition, measurement, and instruction.

Educational Psychologist, 22, 255–278.

Kelemen, W. L., Frost, P. J., & Weaver, C. A. (2000). Individual dif-

ferences in metacognition: Evidence against a general metacog-

nitive ability. Memory & Cognition, 28, 92–107.

King, A. (1991). Effects of training in strategic questioning on chil-

dren’s problem-solving performance. Journal of Educational

Psychology, 83, 307–317.

King, A. (1997). ASK to THINK—TEL WHY®©: A model of

transactive peer tutoring for scaffolding higher level complex

thinking. Educational Psychologist, 32, 221–235.

King, A. (1998). Transactive peer tutoring: Distributing cogni-

tion and metacognition. Educational Psychology Review, 10,

57–74.

King, A., Staffieri, A., & Adelgais, A. (1998). Mutual peer tutoring:

Effects of structuring tutorial interaction to scaffold peer learn-

ing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 134–152.

Klin, C. M., Guzman, A. E., & Levine, W. H. (1997). Knowing that

you don’t know: Metamemory and discourse processing.

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and

Cognition, 23, 1378–1393.

Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it:

How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to

inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social

Psychology, 77, 1121–1134.

Kuhn, D. (1999). A developmental model of critical thinking.

Educational Researcher, 28(2), 16–26, 46.

Kuhn, D. (2000). Metacognitive development. Current Directions

in Cognitive Science, 9, 178–181.

Lambert, W. E. (1981). Bilingualism and language acquisition.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 379, 9–22.

Loranger, A. L. (1994). The study strategies of successful and un-

successful high school students. Journal of Reading Behavior,

26, 347–360.

Maki, R. H. (1998). Test predictions over text material. In D. J.

Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in

educational theory and practice (pp. 117–144). Mahwah, NJ:

Erlbaum.

Maki, R. H., & Berry, S. (1984). Metacomprehension of text

material. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Mem-

ory, and Cognition, 10, 663–679.

Markman, E. M. (1977). Realizing that you don’t understand: A pre-

liminary investigation. Child Development, 48, 986–992.

Markman, E. M. (1979). Realizing that you don’t understand:

Elementary school children’s awareness of inconsistencies. Child

Development, 50, 643–655.

Markman, E. M. (1985). Comprehension monitoring: Developmen-

tal and educational issues. In S. F. Chapman, J. W. Segal, &

R. Glaser (Eds.), Thinking and learning skills: Research and

open questions (pp. 275–291). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. 

Markman, E. M., & Gorin, L. (1981). Children’s ability to adjust

their standards for evaluating comprehension. Journal of Educa-

tional Psychology, 73, 320–325.

Matanzo, J. B., & Harris, D. L. (1999). Encouraging metacogni-

tive awareness in preservice literacy courses. In J. R. Dugan

(Ed.), Advancing the world of literacy: Moving into the 21st

century (pp. 201–225). Carrollton, GA: College Reading

Association.

Mayer, R. E. (2001). Cognitive, metacognitive, and motivational as-

pects of problem solving. In H. Hartman (Ed.), Metacognition in

learning and instruction: Theory, research and practice (pp. 87–

101). Norwell, MA: Kluwer.

McCormick, C. B., & Barnett, J. (1984). Developmental differences

in the effect of signalling upon students’ ability to monitor prose

comprehension. Paper presented at the American Educational

Research Association Meeting, New Orleans, LA.

McCormick, C. B., Busching, B. A., & Potter, E. F. (1992). Chil-

dren’s knowledge about writing: The development and use of

evaluative criteria. In M. Pressley, K. R. Harris, & J. T. Guthrie

100

Metacognition and Learning

(Eds.), Promoting academic competence and literacy in schools:

Cognitive research and instructional innovation (pp. 311–336).

Orlando, FL: Academic Press. 

McInerney, V., McInerney, D. M., & Marsh, H. W. (1997). Effects of

metacognitive strategy training within a cooperative group learn-

ing context on computer achievement and anxiety: An aptitude-

treatment interaction study. Journal of Educational Psychology,

89, 686–695.

Meichenbaum, D., & Biemiller, A. (1992). In search of student

expertise in the classroom: A metacognitive analysis. In M.

Pressley, K. R. Harris, & J. T. Guthrie (Eds.), Promoting acade-

mic competence and literacy in school (pp. 3–56). San Diego,

CA: Academic Press.

Metcalfe, J. (1998). Insight and metacognition. In G. Mazzoni &

T. O. Nelson (Eds.), Metacognition and cognitive neuropsychol-

ogy: Monitoring and control processes (pp. 181–197). Mahwah,

NJ: Erlbaum.

Miller, G. E. (1985). The effects of general and specific self-

instruction training on children’s comprehension monitoring

performances during reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 20,

616–628.

Miller, G. E., Giovenco, A., & Rentiers, K. A. (1987). Fostering com-

prehension monitoring in below average readers through self-

instruction training. Journal of Reading Behavior, 14, 379–393.

Myers, M., II, & Paris, S. G. (1978). Children’s metacognitive

knowledge about reading. Journal of Educational Psychology,

70, 680–690.

Nelson, T. O. (1996). Consciousness and metacognition. American

Psychologist, 51, 102–116.

Nelson, T. O. (1999). Cognition versus metacognition. In R. J.

Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of cognition (pp. 625–641).

Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Nelson, T. O., & Dunlosky, J. (1991). When people’s judgements of

learning (JOLs) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent

recalls: The “delayed JOL effect.” Psychological Science, 2,

267–270.

Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1994). Why investigate metacogni-

tion? In J. Metcalfe & A. P. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition:

Knowing about knowing (pp. 1–25). Cambridge, MA: MIT

Press.

O’Donnell, A. M., Dansereau, D. F., Hall, R. H., & Rocklin, T. R.

(1987). Cognitive, social/affective, and metacognitive outcomes

of scripted cooperative learning. Journal of Educational Psy-

chology, 79, 431– 437.

Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of

comprehension-fostering and monitoring activities. Cognition

and Instruction, 1, 117–175.

Paris, S. G., & Lindauer, B. K. (1982). The development of cogni-

tive skills during childhood. In B. Wolman (Ed.), Handbook of

developmental psychology (pp. 333–349). Englewood Cliffs, NJ:

Prentice-Hall.

Paris, S. G., & Myers, M., II. (1981). Comprehension monitoring,

memory, and study strategies of good and poor readers. Journal

of Reading Behavior, 13, 5–22.

Paris, S. G., & Winograd, P. (1990). How metacognition can

promote academic learning and instruction. In B. Jones & L.

Idol (Eds.),  Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction

(pp. 15– 51). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Pearson, P. D., & Stephens, D. (1994). Learning about literacy: 

A 30-year journey. In R. B. Ruddell, M. R. Ruddell, & H. Singer

(Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (4th ed.,

pp. 22–42). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

Pierce, B. H., & Smith, S. M. (2001). The postdiction superiority

effect in metacomprehension of text. Memory & Cognition, 29,

62–67.

Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. (1993).

Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for

Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychologi-

cal Measurement, 53, 801–813.

Pratt, M. W., & Wickens, G. (1983). Checking it out: Cognitive

style, context, and problem type in children’s monitoring of

text comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75,

716–726.

Pressley, M., Borkowski, J. G., & Schneider, W. (1987). Cognitive

strategies: Good strategy users coordinate metacognition

and knowledge. In R. Vasta & G. Whitehurst (Eds.), Annals of

child development (Vol. 5, pp. 89–129). Greenwich, CT: JAI

Press.

Pressley, M., & Ghatala, E. S. (1988). Delusions about performance

on multiple-choice comprehension tests. Reading Research

Quarterly, 23, 454–464.

Pressley, M., & Ghatala, E. S. (1989). Metacognitive benefits of

taking a test for children and young adolescents. Journal of

Experimental Child Psychology, 47, 430–450.

Pressley, M., & Ghatala, E. S. (1990). Self-regulated learning:

Monitoring learning from text. Educational Psychologist, 25,

19–33.

Pressley, M., Ghatala, E. S., Woloshyn, V., & Pirie, J. (1990).

Sometimes adults miss the main ideas and do not realize it:

Confidence in responses to short-answer and multiple choice

comprehension questions. Reading Research Quarterly, 25,

232–249.

Pressley, M., Snyder, B. L., Levin, J. R., Murray, H. G., & Ghatala,

E. S. (1987). Perceived readiness for examination of per-

formance (PREP) produced by initial reading of text and text

containing adjunct questions. Reading Research Quarterly, 22,

219–236.

Pressley, M., Van Etten, S., Yokoi, L., Freebern, G., & Van Meter, P.

(1998). The metacognition of college studentship: A grounded the-

ory approach. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser

(Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 347–

366). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. 

References

101

Raphael, T. E., Englert, C. S., & Kirschner, B. W. (1989). Students’

metacognitive knowledge about writing. Research in the Teach-

ing of English, 23, 343–379.

Rawson, K. A., Dunlosky, J., & Thiede, K. W. (2000). The rereading

effect: Metacomprehension accuracy improves across reading

trials. Memory & Cognition, 28, 1004–1010.

Roehler, L. R., & Duffy, G. G. (1984). Direct explanation of com-

prehension processes. In G. G. Duffy, L. R. Roehler, & J. Mason

(Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Perspectives and sugges-

tions (pp. 265–280). New York: Longman.

Rosenshine, B., & Meister, C. (1994). Reciprocal teaching: A review

of the research. Review of Educational Research, 64, 479–530.

Rubman, C. N., & Waters, H. S. (2000). A, B seeing: The role of

constructive processes in children’s comprehension monitoring.

Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 503–514.

Ruddell, R. B., Ruddell, M. R., & Singer, H. (Eds.). (1994). Theo-

retical models and processes of reading (4th ed.). Newark, DE:

International Reading Association.

Salomon, G., Globerson, T., & Guterman, E. (1989). The computer

as a zone of proximal development: Internalizing reading-related

metacognitions from a reading partner. Journal of Educational

Psychology, 81, 620–627.

Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1986). Writing. In R. F. Dillon &

R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Cognition and instruction (pp. 59–81).

Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

Schraw, G. (2001). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. In

H. Hartman (Ed.), Metacognition in learning and instruction:

Theory, research and practice (pp. 3–16). Norwell, MA: Kluwer.

Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive

awareness.

Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19,

460–475.

Schraw, G., Dunkle, M. E., Bendixen, L. D., & Roedel, T. D. (1995).

Does a general monitoring skill exist? Journal of Educational

Psychology, 87, 433–444.

Schraw, G., & Impara, J. C. (Eds.). (2000). Issues in the measure-

ment of metacognition. Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental

Measurements and Department of Educational Psychology,

University of Nebraska-Lincoln.

Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories.

Educational Psychology Review, 7, 351–371.

Schraw, G., & Nietfeld, J. (1998). A further test of the general mon-

itoring skill hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90,

236–248.

Schwartz, B. L., & Metcalfe, J. (1994). Methodological problems

and pitfalls in the study of human metacognition. In J. Metcalfe

& A. P. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about

knowing (pp. 93–113). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 

Shimamura, A. (1994). The neuropsychology of metacognition. In

J. Metcalfe & A. P. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing

about knowing (pp. 253–276). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Sitko, B. (1998). Knowing how to write: Metacognition and writ-

ing instruction. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser

(Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 93–

115). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. 

Son, L. K., & Metcalfe, J. (2000). Metacognitive and control strate-

gies in study-time allocation. Journal of Experimental Psychol-

ogy: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 204–221.

Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human

intelligence. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Sternberg, R. J. (2001). Metacognition, abilities, and developing

expertise: What makes an expert student? In H. Hartman (Ed.),

Metacognition in learning and instruction: Theory, research and

practice (pp. 247–260). Norwell, MA: Kluwer.

Stolarek, E. A. (1994). Prose modeling and metacognition: The

effect of modeling on developing a metacognitive stance to-

ward writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 28,

154–174.

Swanson, H. L. (1990). Influence of metacognitive knowledge and

aptitude on problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychol-

ogy, 82, 306–314.

Taylor, B. M., & Beach, R. W. (1984). The effects of text struc-

ture instruction on middle-grade students’ comprehension and

production of expository text. Reading Research Quarterly, 19,

134–146.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA:

MIT Press.

Walczyk, J. J., & Hall, V. C. (1989a). Effects of examples and

embedded questions on the accuracy of comprehension self-

assessments. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 435–437.

Walczyk, J. J., & Hall, V. C. (1989b). Is the failure to monitor com-

prehension an instance of cognitive impulsivity? Journal of

Educational Psychology, 81, 294–298.

Weaver, C. A., III. (1990). Constraining factors in calibration of

comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning,

Memory, and Cognition, 16, 214–222.

Weaver, C. A., III, & Bryant, D. S. (1995). Monitoring of compre-

hension: The role of text difficulty in metamemory for narrative

and expository text. Memory & Cognition, 23, 12–22.

Weinstein, C. E., Zimmerman, S. A., & Palmer, D. R. (1988).

Assessing learning strategies: The design and development of

the LASSI. In C. Weinstein, E. T. Goetz, & P. A. Alexander

(Eds.), Learning and study strategies: Issues in assessment, in-

struction, and evaluation (pp. 25–40). San Diego, CA: Aca-

demic Press.

Weir, C. (1998). Using embedded questions to jump-start metacog-

nition in middle school remedial readers. Journal of Adolescent

& Adult Literacy, 41, 458–467.

Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated

learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.),

Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277–

304). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.