I intraduction chapter I theoretical

II. CHAPTER II.BODY PART
2.1 ANALYSIS
A) ANALYSIS INTO IMMEDIATE CONSTITUENTS
Synthetic morphological evaluation is most successfully carried out using a technique called instantaneous materials evaluation (IC's). Instantaneous materials are any of the two significant elements that form a larger linguistic unity. This technique was first proposed by L. Bloomfield1 and has subsequently been developed by many linguists.2 The main type of competition is between a base and an affix. It is a form of segmentation that reveals now not the notes of a phrase, but its motivation, that is, the statistics the listener must go through in order to understand it. This means that unmotivated phrases and phrases with impaired motivation must be remembered and understood as individual signs rather than as mixtures of different signs. The approach is based on the fact that a phrase characterized by morphological divisibility (analyzed into morphemes) participates in certain structural relationships. This means that, in the words of Z. Harris, "morphemic obstacles in an utterance are now determined not on the basis of questions pertaining to the given utterance, but on the basis of contrast with other utterances. The comparison is controlled, i.e., we do not simply check a set of random utterances, but look for utterances that differ from our unique one only in the parts indicated. Last, we consider utterances that may differ minimally from ours. "3 A template assessment that has become almost classic and is repeated by many authors is L. Bloomfield's assessment of the phrase ungentlemanly. Since the phrase is convenient, we take an identical example. Comparing this phrase with other utterances, the listener recognizes the morpheme - un- as a bad prefix, since he regularly encounters phrases patterned after un- + adjective: uncertain, unconscious, uneasy, unfortunate, unmistakable, unnatural. Some examples further resembled this phrase; they were: unearthly, unsightly, untimely, unwomely, unwomanly, and the like. The adjective gentlemanly can also be found. Thus, with the primary reduction, we reap subsequent instantaneous materials: un - + gentlemanly. If we retain our assessment, we see that although gent takes place as a free form in low colloquial usage, a word combination like lemanly is not observed either as a free or as a definite component, so this time we must separate the latter morpheme. This is justified, since after the noun-derivative with base + - ly there follow many adjectives, including womanly, masterly, scholarly, soldierly with identical semantic dating 'having great character, indicated by the base'; besides, we met the noun gentleman in various utterances. The first ranges of evaluation ended in a free and definite form: 1) un~ + gentlemanly, 2) gentleman + - ly. The abbreviation 0.33 has its own peculiarities. The division into gent-+-lemon is clearly impossible, since there are no such styles in English, so the diminutive is mild - + - guy. A comparable pattern is found in nobleman, and so we nationalize the adjective stem+ guy. Now the part guy can be variously denoted as a semi-affix (see §6.2.2) or as a variant of the free form guy. The phrase mild is open to discussion. It is clearly divisible etymologically: mild < (O) Fr gentil < Lat gentilis allows us to identify the base or instead the novel detail gent - and the suffix - il. But since we are concerned exclusively with synchronic evaluation, this division is irrelevant. If, however, we evaluate the adjective mild with adjectives such as brittle, fertile, fickle, juvenile, little, noble, diffused, and several others containing the suffix - lei-He, placed on a definite base, they form the pattern for our case. The definite base that remains is a gift within the following group: mild, gently, gentleness, genteel, gentile, gentry, etc. We could assume that our method of searching for comparable utterances proved that there is a vulgar expression gent in the English lexicon, mentioned above, meaning "a man claiming to be a gentleman" or simply "a guy", but then there can be no such form as the noun stem + - le, so the expression gent should be interpreted as a contraction of gentleman and a homonym of the definite stem in question. To summarize: by breaking down the phrase, we get the simplest IC at any stage, one of which is the basis of the given phrase. All the time the evaluation is based solely on the stylistic function of the English vocabulary. As an example, demonstrating the interdependence of all materials, divided into many levels, we get the following formula:
un - + { [{gent - + - le) + - man] + - ly}
Breaking a phrase into its instant materials we look at in every reduce the structural order of the materials (which might also additionally vary from their real collection). Furthermore we will reap handiest materials at every reduce, the last materials, however, may be organized in keeping with their collection withinside the phrase: un-+gent-+-le+-guy+'ly.⁴
A box-like diagram supplying the 4 cuts defined seems as follows: