Innovation of the republic of uzbekistan samarkand state institute of foreign languages

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

---

34 
CONCLUSION 
An overview of the classifications presented here suggests as a substitute various 
techniques to practically the equal material. And even although they contain 
inconsistencies and certain contradictions they reflect the scholars' attempts to 
overcome an inventorial description of devices. They obviously deliver stylistic learn 
about of expressive ability to an advanced level, sustained via the linguistic lookup of 
the 20th century that allows to explore and provide an explanation for the linguistic 
nature of the stylistic function. This contribution into stylistic principle made by modem 
linguistics is no longer contained to classifying research only. It has inspired 
exploration of other areas of lookup such as decoding stylistics or stylistic grammar 
that will be discussed in further chapters. 
Syntagmatic semasiology or semasiology of sequences deals with semantic 
relationships expressed at the lengh of a total text. As wonderful from paradigmatic 
semasiology which studies the stylistic effect of renaming syntagmatic semasiology 
studies sorts of names used for linear association of meanings. 
Skrebnev calls these repetitions of meanings represented via feel units in a textual 
content figures of co-occurrence. The most usual sorts of semantic relationships can be 
described as identical, one of a kind or opposite. Accordingly he singles out figures of 
identity, figures of inequality and figures of contrast. 
Syntagmatic morphology deals with the significance of grammar types used in a 
paragraph or text that help in creating a sure stylistic effect. 
We find plenty in common between Skrebnev's description of this place and 
Leech's definition of syntagmatic deviant figures. Skrebnev writes: "Varying the 
morphological means of expressing grammatical notions is based... upon the accepted 
rule: monotonous repetition of morphemes or regularly occurring recurrence of 
morphological meanings expressed differently..." (47, p. 146). 

---

35 
He also suggests that while it is normally viewed a stylistic fault it acquires 
exceptional which means when used on purpose. He describes the impact finished by 
using the use of morphological synonyms of the genetive with Shakespeare - the 
possessive case (Shakespeare's plays), prepositional of-phrase (the plays of 
Shakespeare) and an attributive noun (Shakespeare plays) as "elegant variation" of style. 
Syntagmatic lexicology studies the "word-and-context" juxtaposition that 
provides a variety of stylistic problems - mainly these related with co-occurrence of 
phrases of quite a number stylistic colourings. 
Each of these instances need to be considered in my view due to the fact every 
literary textual content is special in its preference and mixture of words. Such 
phenomena as a number instances of intentional and unintentional lexical combinations 
as nicely as types of lexical recurrence fall in with this approach. 

---

36