qu’il n’avoit pas
.
He loved to be thought awful, mysterious,
and gloomy, and sometimes hinted at
strange causes. I believe the whole to have been the creation and sport of a wild and powerful fancy. In
170: Scott – who can paint your Christian knight or Saracen, / Serf, Lord, Man: B. seems principally to be
thinking of
Ivanhoe (1819) about which all he able to say elsewhere is that it is
good (BLJ VII 113).
171: Shakespeare and Voltaire – / Of one or both of whom he seems the heir: the Tory Scott would have been
pleased at the comparison with Shakespeare; less so at that with Voltaire.
172: That to CHP IV.
the
same manner he crammed people as it is termed about duels, etc.,
which never existed, or were
much exaggerated.
——————
What
I liked about Byron, besides his boundless genius, was his generosity
of spirit as well as
purse, and his utter contempt of all the affectations of literature, from the school-magisterial stile to the
lackadaisical.