Pokonferencyjna

particular interest causes, research of the 
vivid making structure of the conceptu-
al  – sphere of material on the types of 
different texts, those allowed to the au-
thor to reduce the different types of cog-
nitive metaphors, and also to set the ad-
ditional row of cultural concepts entering 
in studying conceptual-sphere. Such go-
ing near the study of the language phe-
nomena appears very interesting. Think, 
that this approach can also can be used 
and in the analysis of the stylistic phe-
nomena, as facilities of creation of vivid-
ness in the text. Large interest is presented 
also by divisions, in that an author study 
verbalization of concept in sacral texts be-
ing to date the least studied object of re-
search. Bringing in such of language ma-
terial pulls out the very thorny problem of 
co-operation of language and religion and 
requires from the researcher of not only 
linguistic but also theology cognitions.
«In different civilizations and in all 
centuries concept good and bad conceives 
differently not like positive and negative 
features. Some societies thinks that both 
of them includes into one individual 
group, even for this features there are one 
general point of view, good and bad marks 
enter into meaning of the phraseological 
structure» (Sokolova, 2004, p. 39). We 
agree with Sokolova’s point, from gath-
ered English and Karakalpak examples, 
which represented morality showed indi-
viduality, and in some cases general char-
acteristics.
“Adam” (man) is a frequently-used 
word but it is difficult to define it clearly. 
“Adam” (man) in its various configura-
tions links people and communities to-
gether in some sort of reciprocally benefi-
cial association that forms societies. Thus 
“adam” (man) is a conceptual-sphere that 
deserves attention. The mankind never 
existed isolated: every man had his sur-
rounding, and defined the relationships 
with those who surrounded him. From 
the ancient times, since our early ances-
tors inhabited the Earth, there appeared 
such realia as family, love, friendship, ha-
tred, etc. which served as the differentiat-
ing notions for the feelings and attitude to 
certain men or societies. The study of 
such reality as friendship involves the 
study of the culture of the defined society, 
which includes the investigation of men-
tal processes (i.e. psychology, philoso-
phy), folklore, literature, mass media, reli-
gion, etc.
The given article deals with proverbs 
with concept “man/adam” representing 
English and Karakalpak national picture 
of the world. Materials of the article were 
classified on thematic groups and investi-
gated their zoonimic components with 
concept “man/adam”.
For example:
Every bird likes its own nest//Baka ku-
linde, khar kim tiwgan elinde (Frog in its 
pool, each person could live on mother-
land);
The biggest building is in the most dan-
ger of falling//Tuyenin ulkeni kopirde tay-
ak jeydi (Elder camel guilty on the bridge).
In these proverbs we draw your atten-
tion on lexis «bird», «the biggest build-
ing», «baka» (frog), «tuye» (camel). In 
each language they are the names of ani-
mals and things and at the same time they 

---

128 
MONOGRAFIA POKONFERENCYJNA
are representing concept “people”, “per-
son”, “man”. So, for the definition of the 
term “concept” we can find different ex-
planations. But we found one general 
point of view about term “concept” al-
most all foreign and native scientists: 
concept is mental-cognitive bases, which 
represents view and understanding about 
fragments of the reality. Concept can have 
lingua-expression. Proverbs will be served 
as united view for the concept.
To conclude, we can say, undoubtedly, 
that most characteristics of the concept of 
adam are the vary in any culture because 
this notion represents the deepest and the 
most affectionate feeling which lies on the 
basement of love,  but, nevertheless, it 
should be considered from the point of 
view of the culture as cultures of the na-
tions were and will never be the same ex-
cept those traditions and customs, which 
are purely religious, other spheres as men-
tal processes, folklore, etc. must have to be 
treated separate from the general notion 
of friendship.