Pokonferencyjna

Bibliography
1.  Sitwell Sir Osbert. Rona1d Firbank. Noble 
essences or Courteous
2.  Revelations. London,1950. – 187 p.
3.  Fausset Hugh I’A. Valmouth and Other 
Stories. London: The Bookman, 1930.  – 
341 p.
4.  Wild Pleasing Fables// Times Literary 
Supplement, December 16, 1949, 824.
5.  Forster E.M. Ronald Firbank. London: 
Abinger Harvest,1936. – 113 p.
6.  Charques R. D. Five Novels// The Specta-
tor:1949. – 902 p.
7.  Wilson Edmund. Classics and commer-
cials. New York.1950.
8.  Cyril Connolly. Enemies and Promise.
London,1938.- 345 p.
9.  Evelyn Waugh. Ronald Firbank.//Life and 
Letters. Scien.magazine: London,1929.  – 
325 p.

---

  191 
PHILOLOGY,  SOCIOLOGY AND CULTUROLOGY №14
Abdukodir Hayitmetov is a leading 
literary critic, literary method, as well as 
the artistic style of the literary criticism. 
Hayitmetov was one of the first, who first 
studied the artistic method and style of 
literature on the example of Navoi, later 
on the Oriental literature [1,2]. The 
creative method of medieval Oriental 
classical literature, including its one of its 
most important figures, is one of the 
important aspects of scientific research, 
which includes the solution of the 
following problems: Firstly, the levels and 
requirements of creativity, the general 
state of the art, and is bound by its 
extremely complex, multifaceted and 
controversial whole creative activity, 
ideological approach, artistic means and 
methods, directly covering most of these, 
and, secondly, The problems posed by the 
problems of theoretical nature are closely 
linked to the ancient Greek and Roman 
centuries-old Central Asia and Iran, Arab 
and Azerbaijani culture, especially to 
literature, art, philosophy and aesthetic 
teachings from the 15th century to the 
third century, as well as the creative 
method and many other issues related to 
it, to Hayitmetov. Hashim [3], A. Saadi 
[4], N.Mallaev [5], V.Zohidov [6], were 
not specifically studied and analyzed.
Properly identifying the relationship 
between style and style, the essence, 
relationships, and complexity of each one 
of them can help to comprehensively 
comprehend many of the issues that are 
directly related to them [2.280]. Therefore, 
Hayitmetov drew attention to the 
following aspects of Navoi’s creative work 
and the creative method of Oriental 
literature:
1. Conceptual study of creative method 
in Navoi and Oriental literature. The 
creative method of Navoi is a part of the 
creative method of the whole Oriental 
literature, which is a traditional 
continuation of the present method 
(romanticism, realism), until the creative 
method of the scientist is not only an 
artist, but also a characteristic of the 
entire era;
2. Romanticism in Navoi’s creativity. 
As the novel examines the methodology of 
romanticism in the world literature, this 
trend, which emerged in Europe in the late 
1800s and early 19th centuries, 
characterizes the common features and 
distinctive features of Oriental literature,