Sector Assistance Program Evaluation on Education in Uzbekistan

Key 
Assumptions/Risks 
(Input–Output) 
- No major reversal of direction of education 
reform by government (risk: delays in 
approval and implementation) 
RTRFF approved; the RTRFF Charter 
registered, the executive director of the fund 
appointed, and the fund made operational.

---

Appe
ndix 
6
71
DMFs as per RRP 
Project Name and 
Details 
Impact/Outcome/Output Performance 
Targets 
Progress/Status/Issues as per PPR
(as of 31 January 2010) 
 
 
- (Close coordination among central, oblast, 
raion
and school management to ensure 
accurate education management 
information system data and timely 
planning, production, and distribution of 
textbooks and teacher guides; continuation 
of committed government budget support 
throughout project; continued close 
supervision of TRS collections; 
maintenance of TRS collection rates (risks: 
declining collection rates; government 
failure to provide textbook subsidy support 
for the poorest) 
- Continued demand for professional training 
based on continuation of textbook market 
at no less than current levels; high rate of 
retention of those trained (risks: opposition 
to full private sector access to the textbook 
market; delays in the privatization of key 
state textbook publishing and printing 
companies) 
- 
Continuation (no decrease) of school 
operating budgets (risk: hokimiyats fail to 
provide required support for school library 
refurbishment)
 
There is close cooperation among school 
management officials in implementing the 
project. 
To be assessed. 
Counterpart funds (both central and local) 
provided no risk that this will occur.