Some people think the spread of multinational companies and globalization produce positive outcomes for everyone

To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples from your knowledge or experience.
Developed nations are frequently seen providing economic assistance to third-world countries. However, it does not always help reduce poverty; therefore, it is argued that less affluent nations must be provided with an alternative form of aid which will help them in the long run. This essay discusses why developing countries can be better off from such assistance and the types of help offered.
Firstly, when developed countries give money to undeveloped countries, it will help citizens in these countries solve short-term problems, and it will not last long. When inhabitants in emerging countries receive money from donations, they use it to pay the temporary cost or issues. For instance, in 2005, the United States donated about 20 billion to some undeveloped countries, but still, it only helped people solve the problem f for two months. After two months, they continued poorly.
Moreover, developed countries should invest in healthcare and education rather than loan money to other countries. When the younger generation receives a quality education and everyone has access to proper medical treatment and hospitality, it will help eliminate unemployment and prevent people from resorting to unlawful activities. So developed countries must avail in building good schools, universities, and hospitals. Moreover, they can help stabilize the government in these countries and monitor whether the political environment is conducive to growth. Although money helps feed the hungry lot, it is only a temporary solution.
However, before providing help with other aid to developing countries, developed countries should give financial assistance to developing countries because people say that money does solve most problems.
To summarize, I favour the opinion that rich countries should provide practical help to improve the economic status of developing countries. However, financial assistance can only help to a certain extent and is not the definite way to eliminate poverty.

Currently, the gap between affluent and poor nations is expanding. Even today, millions of people in developing countries lack access to health care and education. Since their governments lack the financial resources to enhance their citizens' standard of living, some believe that wealthy nations should provide financial assistance. I agree with this recommendation. In my opinion, rich nations should support poor nations.

Firstly, wealthy nations have excess finances. By providing financial assistance to underdeveloped nations, the global quality of life can be raised. Poverty is the underlying cause of numerous societal evils. It is a well-known fact that numerous antisocial elements thrive in disadvantaged countries. In general, the impoverished are unhappy with their own life. They are also furious with the wealthy. Obviously, many of them exhibit criminal tendencies. They cannot be reformed without an improvement in their living conditions. By offering financial aid to needy nations, wealthy nations can alleviate poverty in those nations and contribute to a more peaceful world.
In addition to financial support, wealthier nations should employ other means to aid the needy. The strategies will focus on enhancing the motivation, survival abilities, and knowledge of the recipients. Therefore, they will be able to govern their country effectively and enhance their living conditions. As a result, living conditions in less developed countries will improve and they will be able to rely on their own resources.
In conclusion, I believe that high levels of corruption and weak governance are the primary causes of poverty in underdeveloped nations. However, this can be resolved by instituting the appropriate rules and regulations.
Today more and more full time university students focus on other activities rather than spend a lot of time studying. Some people think it is essential for university students to be involved in other activities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Due to an increasing number of university students paying more attention to other activities instead of studying, this leads to the fact that many debatable arguments related to whether it is important to have students involved in other activities or not have been lit. In my opinion, I advocate the former idea to support students to have more experiences and to build up connections to society by taking part in certain activities.
Firstly, by involving in many activities such as internships or joining small projects, students could have experiences and lessons, which would be useful when they graduated. To be more specific, being exposed to various experiences is the most effective way to help students to apply their knowledge that they learned from universities in reality. As a result, they could deeply understand their lessons and gain valuable experiences through failures rather than blindly learn by heart without using it. Moreover, they are likely to gain better insights from people working in their studying field, so that they can build up their competency to be suitable for job markets. According to a science article conducted in several universities, the studying performances and rate of students getting jobs after their graduations increased significantly, since these tertiary systems add internships in companies each semester.
Secondly, certain activities might help students to build connections to society, making them more responsible. For instance, by taking part in charity activities, students could have chances to help and meet people who are in difficulties; therefore, it not only nurtures their kindness but also makes them realize their responsibilities to solve these existing issues among the society. By doing this, students could gain motivation for their studies and better use their time in helping people instead of wasting it on playing games. Because of that, they become decent citizens in the future, which could result in decreases in crime rates. Therefore, society becomes more secure, and the government can have good labor forces in developing the country. Taking England as an example, researchers claim that the main reason why this country has the finest domestic labor forces is the curriculums of universities that obligate students to attend at least three social activities before graduating.
In conclusion, university students could gain many benefits by involving charity or internships. Because of this, governments should consider encouraging students to take part in these activities.

2. In universities, students expend a lot of time heeding to their studies, and the importance of education has never been in doubt. But, some people argue that students should also focus on extracurricular activities during their college days. In this essay, I will discuss why I agree with the former perspective.

Firstly, the purpose of attending universities is to enhance and polish one’s knowledge. Hence, students spend a significant amount of time and effort in preparing for lectures, examinations and subsequent academic activities, which pertain to the bookish nature of the subject. Focusing on exams, if you score high and do well, you have a higher chance of getting a good job. Hence, spending time studying is a way to learn skills pertaining to one’s field of study.
Secondly, to spend time seeking knowledge also aids a person’s thinking and thought processes. For instance, mathematics is often beneficial to incite a deeper state of thinking in specific individuals, just like psychology facilitates introspection. It is a notable step towards self-actualisation, something that almost every human being tries to fulfil.
However, extracurricular activities are also deemed an excellent way to acquire skills resulting in success in life. For instance, sports is a great way to imbibe discipline and a healthy lifestyle. But, concentrating more on studies in the university is indeed essential because one carries through their purpose of attaining knowledge.
To sum up, it is crucial to acknowledge the importance of extracurricular activities in one’s life. However, during the college and university years, a student must devote a significant amount of time towards his studies.
Some people think that government should not give international aid since they have disadvantaged people like unemployed and homeless in their own country. To what Topic: Some people think that governments should not spend money on international aids if there are disadvantaged people like the unemployed and homeless in their own country. To what extent do you agree or disagree?