Some people think the spread of multinational companies and globalization produce positive outcomes for everyone

Some people think to solve traffic and transportation problems people should be encouraged to live in the suburbs or the countryside rather than in cities.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Sample Answer
Traffic congestion is one of the major complications in most metropolitan cities. Many personages say that the antidote to resolving this issue is to motivate citizens to relocate to the suburban arena. I necessarily disagree with the given statement, because moving to the countryside will not be the feasible remedy rather improving transportation services in the city and encouraging people to use that will help to a certain extent.
To begin with, because of the industrial developments and opportunities available, individuals tend to move to the urban area and the density of the population in such areas is more. This caused increased traffic congestion in cities. To resolve this issue, encouraging folks to live on the outskirts of the town will not be an effective solution, rather this will increase travel time for them and the question will remain the same. As an illustration, Brampton and Mississauga are the suburbs area around Toronto city, many individuals prefer to live here since the house prices and rents are comparatively less than the downtown prices, but it takes around one and half hours to reach work. Hence, this treatment will not help to solve the jam and transportation issues.
On the other hand, improving conveyance facilities can tackle the vehicle problem to a great extent. Firstly, The population should be encouraged to use public transit, the government can declare some discounts on bus or train tickets and monthly passes, so everyone will start to use public transit. Secondly, another viable solution could be changing struggle hours, for example, if one company starts their work at 8 am, another company in the same area can ask their employees to start tasks at 9 am. This variation will help to manage the crowd on the road at peak times. For criterion, in the USA, taking a variety of time, more corporations have been decreasing their log jam drastically.
To conclude, forcing the public to move to the suburbs and the village will not help to address the problem of traffic blockage. I believe, encouraging to practice public transit may help along with variation in job hours to manage the crowd.
(356 words)

It is argued that people from suburbs or countryside should be persuaded to move into the cities as a solution to the traffic and transportation woe. This essay disagrees with the above statement and will, therefore, explain how it deteriorates the present situation. Firstly, urbanization brings a lot more traffic problems to the cities and secondly, it’s very expensive to live in urban areas.
Urbanization means there will be more vehicles in the cities as people from different age groups will need them to move around together. Also, in order to complete their day to day tasks and responsibilities, the new residents will require more transportation services. This will increase traffic congestion, particularly during peak hours. In New York, for instance, 40% of people use personal vehicles to travel, which is more than one million automobiles on the roads. People settling from rural areas into New York looking for opportunities made this happen and it has resulted in daily traffic jams.
Living in a city, compared to the suburbs, is very expensive. Housing is not cheap in the cities and the cost of rent is skyrocketing. Not only the accommodations but also the food and other services such as bus passes cost a lot more than in rural areas. People may not have enough funds necessary to afford these burdens added along to the cost of moving. Toronto is a prime example where it costs an average person’s monthly salary to rent a one-bedroom apartment.
In conclusion, encouraging public to move into cities would not help in solving traffic and transportation problems because of the fact that more people cause more traffic and the high living cost making it an unaffordable option to many.

Some people argue that the best solution to the traffic and pollution woes in cities is to encourage suburban and rural people to relocate to urban areas. I do not agree with this view because cities are already bulging at the seams. If more people move to the city, it will only worsen the situation.

Encouraging rural and suburban people to relocate to the cities will certainly help to reduce traffic congestion and pollution if the cities can accommodate them. This is because most people living in suburbs have jobs in the city. Consequently, every morning they travel all the way from their home to their office in the city causing traffic jams along the way. Vehicles caught in traffic emit more poisonous gases to the atmosphere and thus increase air pollution. By contrast, if they live in a place near their office in the city, they can reduce their travelling time and distance. This will solve traffic problems. Hence, if the cities have sufficient infrastructure to accommodate all of these people, it is certainly a great solution to traffic and pollution problems. Unfortunately, this is not the case and most cities are starved for space.
A better solution is to encourage more businesses to set up their operations in rural areas. This will create more jobs in those places and thus prevent the migration of rural people into urban areas. When people can find a job close to where they live, they do not have to travel long distances. This will solve traffic problems and the resultant pollution to a great extent. The government should also encourage organizations to offer the work from home option to their employees. Promoting e-commerce is another way to reduce the need for people to travel.
In conclusion, since cities are already overcrowded, it is not practical to move rural people to urban areas with the objective of reducing traffic and pollution. A better solution is to reduce the need for people to travel by providing them with job opportunities close to where they live.

Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to poor countries rather than financial aid.