Some practice in translation

Antonymic Translation
Antonymic translation usually implies a comprehensive lexical and grammatical transformation: an affirmative construction is translated by a negative one or a negative construction – by an affirmative one. But such grammatical transformation is usually accompanied by lexical transformation – the key word of the SL utterance is translated by its antonym in the TL utterance, e.g.
… the undead past – еще живое прошлое.
Let a sleeping dog lie. – Не буди спящую собаку.
Nobody was ever sorry to see him. – Все всегда были рады его видеть.
Antonymic translation is more frequently used when rendering negative constructions by affirmative ones. This may be accounted for by the Stylistic use of negative constructions in English for purposes of expressiveness. The English language uses grammatically only one negative in a sentence – either with a verb or with a noun but it makes a stylistic use of 2 negatives of which one is formed by grammatical means and the other – by means of affixation – negative prefixes or negative suffixes or by lexical means, i.e. by words with a negative meanings.
A sentence containing 2 negatives is negative only on the face of it; actually it is affirmative as the 2 negatives neutralize each other. The grammatical form in this case is not used in its direct meaning and consequently attracts attention, as does, for example, the rhetorical question which is no question at all but an emphatic statement. The clash between the denotative meaning of the grammatical form and its use in speech makes it highly emotive and increases its expressiveness. Thus a double negation has a special connotative meaning. It is not identical, however, with an affirmative statement. It contains a certain modification. It may be an overstatement or an understatement.
British imperialists never failed to recognize the value of tea and fought many a bloody battle to grab the plantations of India.
Британские империалисты всегда прекрасно понимали ценность чая и не раз вели кровавые бои, чтобы захватить индийские чайные плантации.
The double negation is expressed grammatically by the negative adverb “never” and lexically by the Semantics of the verb “to fail” is de-semantized to such an extent that in some cases it is equivalent to a simple negative and is translated accordingly, e..g. he failed to appear – he did not appear.
The combination of a grammatical negative with the comparative degree or superlative degree of the Adverb “little” is always Emphatic and is rendered antonymically.
Dickens is hampered by his age, which demands sentiment and reticence, but in the space that is allowed to him he scampers as if he knew no restraint…Never was he less embarrassed by restrictions than in the exuberance of “Pickwick Papers”.
Диккенс был связан своей эпохой, которая требовала чувствительности и сдержанности, но в дозволенных ему границах он веселится не зная удержу… Никогда он не чувствовал себя более свободным от ограничений, чем в «Записках Пиквикского клуба», где веселье бьет ключoм.
The double negative construction “not … until” may be regarded as a Cliché which is practically always rendered antonymously as “лишь тогда, только (тогда), когда” possessing the same degree of Emphasis.
It was not until I reached the farmyard that I made the discovery. (Susan Howatch)
И только когда я добрался до фермы, я сделал это открытие.
It was not until 1770 when James Cook chartered the East Coast that any major exploration of Australia was undertaken.
И только в1770 году, после того как Джеймс Кук нанес на карту восточное побережье Австалии, началось серьезное исследование этого континента.
He spoke in no uncertain terms. (Susan Howatch)
Он говорил весьма решительно.