as a function of the toll charged. Lowering
the toll increases the
demand for the bridge. Q
c
is the capacity of the bridge. Thus, for
any demand below Q
c
there is no congestion and no marginal cost
associated with the use of the bridge when the bridge is operated
below capacity, consumption is non-rival. Q
1
is the non-toll level of
consumption. It is possible to exclude people from using the bridge
by charging a toll. But, this will result
in under consumption of the
good. At P
0
, the number of trips taken on the bridge will be only Q
0
which is much below Q
1
, the number of trips without the toll. This
results in under consumption of the good.
Under Supply:
In few cases provision of non
excludable public goods are
provided privately. This may be possible when there is a single
large consume whose direct benefits are so large that is beneficial
to provide it for himself. He knows
that there are free riders
benefiting from his actions, but in deciding how much to supply, he
looks at his own direct benefits and not the benefits that add to
others. For instance, there is a large
shipowner and a few small
shipowners. This large shipowner may find it beneficial to install a
light
house and light buoys, even though others cannot exclude
from enjoying the benefits. But in deciding
how many light houses
and buoys to construct, he looks only at the benefits which accrue
to his own ships. He will not take into consideration total benefits of
constructing an additional buoy. Thus, even there is some provision
of public goods privately, there will be an undersupply.
The free rider problem that accompanies
public goods can be
overcome by the government provision of public gods. The
government has the power to compel people to contribute through
taxes.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: