Task – ‘Open-source’ task. Theory – 10 point task – a ‘Open-source’ task. Find/identify main postulates of given great thinker/scholar [from Martin Griffiths

NEOLIBERALISM(IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS) and SOCIAL CONSTRUCTIVISM(IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS)
Neoliberalism and social constructivism are two major theoretical paradigms in International Relations (IR).
Neoliberalism is a theoretical approach that emphasizes the role of international institutions, interdependence, and cooperation among states in shaping international relations. Neoliberals believe that states can and should work together to address common problems, and that international institutions can help regulate state behavior and reduce the likelihood of conflict. They argue that cooperation and interdependence can promote peace and stability in the international system.
Social constructivism, on the other hand, is a theoretical approach that emphasizes the role of norms, ideas, and identities in shaping international relations. Social constructivists argue that state behavior is shaped not only by material interests, but also by the norms, ideas, and identities that they hold. They believe that these norms, ideas, and identities are constructed through interaction and communication among states, and that they can play a significant role in shaping state behavior and international relations. Social constructivists emphasize the importance of norms and ideas in shaping state behavior, and they see international institutions as playing a crucial role in constructing and reinforcing these norms.
In conclusion, neoliberalism and social constructivism are two contrasting perspectives in IR, with neoliberalism emphasizing the role of institutions and interdependence in shaping international relations, and social constructivism emphasizing the role of norms, ideas, and identities.

MARXISM(IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS) and REALISM(IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS)
Neo-Marxism and realism are two major theoretical paradigms in International Relations (IR).
Realism is a power-oriented perspective that assumes that states are the primary actors in international affairs and that their behavior is motivated by self-interest and a desire to maximize power and security. Realists believe that the international system is anarchic and that there is no world government to enforce laws or provide stability, so states must look after their own interests through the pursuit of power and security.
Neo-Marxism, on the other hand, is a theoretical approach that draws on Marxist theories and applies them to the analysis of international relations. Neo-Marxists view international relations as being shaped by the contradictions and conflicts arising from the capitalist system, which they see as inherently exploitative and unjust. They argue that the behavior of states in the international system is shaped by the struggle for economic resources and markets, and that the relationships between states reflect the power struggles between capitalists and workers. Neo-Marxists believe that the international system is not simply anarchic, but that it is also characterized by the systemic exploitation of the less powerful by the more powerful.
In conclusion, realism and neo-Marxism are two contrasting perspectives in IR, with realism focusing on the role of power and self-interest in shaping state behavior, and neo-Marxism emphasizing the role of the contradictions and conflicts arising from the capitalist system in shaping international relations.