What the cip program is recommending

What the CIP Program is recommending

• What the CIP Program is recommending

• Camilla Williams

• CIP Program Specialist

• June 29, 2013

Provide more information:

• Provide more information:

• All creators and contributors, and their affiliations
• For shorter statements of responsibility, provide access points for all names

Core element for children’s illustrators

• Core element for children’s illustrators

• Encourage the use of relationship designators

LC-PCC PS gives catalogers the option to use the source of information as data view or the galley

• LC-PCC PS gives catalogers the option to use the source of information as data view or the galley

• Prefer to use the date from the galley and bracket the date in the 264 field if only the Copyright date is found

Add the Table of Contents, especially those with statements of responsibility

• Add the Table of Contents, especially those with statements of responsibility

Record all ISBNs available in galley

• Record all ISBNs available in galley

• Brigham Young University University of Chicago

• Cornell University University of Florida

• Duke University University of Hawaii

• Frick Art Gallery University of Pennsylvania

• Getty Institute University of Wisconsin

• National Agricultural Library

• National Library of Medicine Two new participants:

• Northwestern University Georgetown University

• Ohio State University New York University Law Library

• Pennsylvania State University

• Queens Public Library, New York

• Stanford University

• Texas A&M University

FY2009 FY2010

• FY2009 FY2010

• Total ECIPs Processed: 48136 Total ECIPs Processed: 56255

• ECIP Partners: 3495 (7%) ECIP Partners: 4320 (8%)

• FY2011 FY2012

• Total ECIPs Processed: 51870 Total ECIPs Processed: 49267

• ECIP Partners: 4572 (9%) ECIP Partners: 4428 (9%)

• FY2013 (through May 31st, 2013)

• Total ECIPs Processed: 33215

• ECIP Partners: 3386 (10%)

Since October of 2009, LC USASH and USPRLL divisions have lost approx. 20% of their staff

• Since October of 2009, LC USASH and USPRLL divisions have lost approx. 20% of their staff

• Many long-term subject specialists have retired

• Fewer ECIPs being processed by LC; however, LC wants to increase its acquisition of materials through CIP

• Slow increase in the proportion of ECIPs processed by partner libraries vs. LC

• Partner libraries have similar pressures as LC in terms of loss of staff and long-term experts retiring

As of June 2nd, 2013:

• As of June 2nd, 2013:

• 3,296 ECIPS are in the Library of Congress backlog. Some areas have very large backlogs:

• Literature

• Political Science

• Religion

• Science

• Technology

• Publishers expressing concern about delays

• In some subject areas, books are published before CIP data is created due to delays

• Publishers abandoning CIP for PCN program

• Pre-publication metadata for libraries, vendors, and bibliographic utilities is less available

• CIP Program put at risk at the very time when it is needed most by overall library community

• New initiatives such as the CIP e-book program are compromised

Greater distribution of ECIP workload benefits everyone:

• Greater distribution of ECIP workload benefits everyone:

• Partake of diversity of subject expertise throughout the nation
• Partners see latest research to build their own collections
• Libraries outside of LC more likely to submit subject proposals to enhance LCSH
• Partners can communicate directly with publishers and authors in areas of interest

• The Library of Congress would like to increase the participation of the ECIP Cataloging Partners to 50% of the total number of ECIPs cataloged by 2020.

What the Library of Congress will do:

• What the Library of Congress will do:

• Program for Cooperative Cataloging currently reaching out to NACO/BIBCO members that are likely candidates to join
• Continued promotion of the ECIP program by the LC CIP staff members through articles, newsletters and presentations at conferences
• Outreach to individuals whenever possible

Be an Ambassador for CIP!

• Be an Ambassador for CIP!

• Increase your coverage if you are able to

• Promote the benefits of the program whenever you can

• Give presentations at your local, state, and regional conferences and ask your partners to join

• Write articles about the program, why you participate, what you like about it, and why you think others could benefit by joining

• Get the word out as to how CIP metadata is critical to our future linked data environment

• THANK YOU!