= 161. 2*362 (075. 8) К211 ббк [81. 2-2 Англ + 81. 2-2 Укр] я 73

complement(s) - very often after the secondary predicate there can be a compliment or the object of this verb, which is "demanded" by the semantics of the given verb and helps to reveal its meaning.
Since Secondary Predication Structures are dependent ones and enter the sentence performing different syntactic functions, they can be classified according to the type of the syntactic structure they enter in the sentence. Before presenting this type of classification the types of syntactic structures should be mentioned.
Considering the syntactic structure of the simple sentence, the Ukrainian linguist A.K. Korsakov (A.K. Корсаков) distinguished 4 types of syntactic structures: the structure of predication (структура предикацГО, the structure of complementation (структура компле-ментаци), the structure of modification (структура модифжацп) and the structure of coordination (структура координаци). In foreign linguistics the notion of the syntactic structure and its four types was introduced by W. Francies in 1958 within the frames of the structural approach towards language study. The views of W. Francies were in their turn based on the ideas of Otto Jespersen and L. Bloomfield.
A.K. Korsakov additionally distinguished two types of the structure of predication - the primary predication (consisting of the subject and the predicate) and the secondary predication (consisting of the secondary subject and the secondary predicate). Within the
structure of complementation (consisting of the head-word and its complement) he distinguished the following types of complements:
1) The subjective complement or the predicative that
characterizes the content of the substance-subject, e.g.: He is a
student.
2) The objective complement, or the object-substance, which is
in certain relations with the substance-subject expressed by the verb-
predicate, e.g.: He studies languages.
3) The adverbial complement pointing towards certain
characteristics of the verb-predicate, e.g.: He lives in Lviv.
4) The verbal complement which is the second verb component
of the predicate, e.g.: He must study well.
Types of coplements are distinguished by A.K. Korsakov taking into consideration their semantic character.
The structure of modification (consisting of the head-word and its modifier) has two types of modifiers: the attributive modifier {He is a quick runner.) and the adverbial modifier {He runs quickly). Of importance is also distinguishing adverbial complements (which cannot be omitted from the sentence without breaking its sense) and adverbial modifiers (that bring in additional information, explaining some other parts of the sentence, and thus, can be omitted from the sentence) that makes both structural and semantic sentence analysis more distinct.
Finally, the structure of coordination (consisting of two components of equal value) is usually represented by two homogeneous members of the sentence that can perform different syntactic functions, e.g.: Peter and Ann rushed downstairs immediately, or He could sing and dance equally well.
Structures of secondary predication (SSP) (структури вторинноУ предикацп), the peculiar phenomenon of the English language (absent in Ukrainian), consisting of the secondary subject and the secondary predicate (e.g.: They (SI) wanted (PI) him (S2) to perform (P2) this task) can themselves enter structures of predication, complementation and coordination. The type of syntactic structure they enter depends on the syntactic function the structure of secondary

256
257

predication performs in the sentence. Taking this into account, SSP
can be classified in the following way: