4. Division of Linguistic Typology with Respect to the Object of Investigation The list of recommended literature

4. Division of Linguistic Typology with Respect to the Object of Investigation

The list of recommended literature:

• 1. АмироваТ. А., Ольховиков Б. А., Рождественский Ю. В. Очерки по истории лингвистики. Москва, 1975 .
• 2. Аракин В. Д. Сравнительная типология английского и тюркского языков. Ленинград, 1979.
• 3. Буранов Д.'Ж. Сравнительная типология английского и русского языков. Москва, 1983.
• 4. Буронов Д. Ж. Ингилиз ва узбек тиллари киёсий грамматикаси Гошкент, 1973.
• 5. Городецкий Б. Ю. К проблеме семантической типологии. Москва, 1969.

Plan

• 1. Genetic typology.
• 2. Areal typology.
• 3. Comparative typology.
• 4. Structural typology: a) linguistic universals; b) etalon language; c) typological classification; d) typological theory.

Key words and expressions to lecture 4

• 1. Genetic typology
• 2. Areal typology
• 3. Comparative typology
• 4. Structural typology
• 5. Etalon language
• 6. Typological theory
• 7. System closeness
• 8. Genetic closeness
• 9. Areal non-limitation
• 10. Deep identity
• 11. Surface identity

12. Etic-emic identity
13. Indifference system closeness
14. Indifference genetic closeness
15. Cros-level approach
16. Content approach
17. Linguistic universals
18. Universal semantic and logical categories
19. Porr-Royal grammar
20. Language universals

According to the subject of comparison linguistic typology consists of the following types:

• According to the subject of comparison linguistic typology consists of the following types:
• Genetic typology deals with the languages which are genetically related both synchronically and diachronically. As an independent branch of linguistic typology it is characterized by the following features:
• Difference to system closeness. It means that language under comparison should belong to the same structural type.
• Difference to the genetic closeness. It means that only genetically related languages can be compared.
• Areal non-limitation of languages.
• Quantitatively languages are limited by a certain genetic group of a family of languages.
• For genetically closely related languages both deep and surface identity and also etic-emic identity are characteristic.
• While etic-emic identity is possible but not obligatory content approach is not used. The traditional approach from form to meaning is basically used in the case.
• The etalon language is limited by certain category of linguistic phenomenon. Typological operation is completed in case when all the languages belong to the same genetic group or family.