Actual problems of modern science, education and training

Ключевые слова: Прагматика, сильная прагматика, слабая прагматика, кодировать, декодировать, высказывание, контексты, общение, формирование, особенности языков, аспекты языков, незнание прагматики, понимание языка, познание прагматики, фундаментальное интеллектуальное принятие значения
Abstract. Pragmatics draws attention to non-linguistic features of languages which also play a crucial role in the formation of meaning. It is inevitable that there are some aspects which can change the meaning of the utterance but are often ignored. Thomas C.Scott-Philips wants to get people’s attention to the importance of pragmatics in the communication and how the cognition and ignorance of pragmatics affect the comprehension of the message. The participants of the conversation usually code the context and the only key to lock and decode this is concerning pragmatics. Social trust ad economic background also may make some alternations in understanding the context which Thomas C.Scott-Philips labels it as strong pragmatics
Key Words: Pragmatics, Strong Pragmatics, Weak Pragmatics, to code, to decode, the utterance, the contexts, the communication, the formation, the features of languages, the aspects of the languages, the ignorance of the pragmatics, the comprehension of the language, the cognition of the pragmatics, The fundamental intellectual acceptance of meaning
Introduction. Pragmatics is always stated as the evolution of language. According to Thomas C.Scott-Philips, there can exist strong and weak pragmatics in the language comprehension. The fundamental intellectual acceptance of meaning of a language usually lies in the govern of several categories and structural aspects of it. Number 1 category as it is traditionally understood as “Prominent parts of language” which can embrace 5 features : sound, phonems, words, phrases and literal meaning. In the article “Pragmatics and the aims of language evolution”, Thomas C.Scott-Philips stated:
Depending on one’s specific questions, it can be productive to abstract away from the complications that pragmatics brings with it. Indeed, this is sometimes the most scientifically appropriate thing to do. All scientific investigation necessarily abstracts away from the issues at other levels of analysis. Many linguistic topics can be profitably pursued without any consideration of pragmatics. One consequence of this is that, despite common acknowledgement that it is important dimension of language and language use, pragmatics is kept at the margins of linguistics as a discipline. In short, the fact that it is connected with the boundary between language and the outside world, a major reason why pragmatics is kept on the periphery of the discipline itself.