VI. SUMMARY
The program described in the paper has been in place for
eight years. During this time we observed a growth in the
number of teacher graduates, a high level of retention, and an
increase in the number of Rutgers physics majors coming
into the program. The unique features of the program are the
strong and continuous emphasis on physics pedagogical
knowledge, ample opportunities for the students to practice
newly acquired knowledge, and the presence of a supportive
community. Students in the program enroll in six physics-
specific teaching methods courses. All of these courses
model the instructional practices that 21st century teachers
are expected to implement. The assessment of the teaching
practices of the graduates shows that they do implement the
knowledge and skills acquired in the program. The program
attracts students despite the high cost and with no external
funding support.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I am grateful to my colleagues in the Graduate school of
Education who supported the change in the physics teacher
preparation program; to the Department of Physics and As-
tronomy that helps recruit students for the program and pro-
vides them with opportunities for clinical practice, my gradu-
ate student Tara Bartiromo who helped organize and edit this
paper; Allison Parker, Danielle Bugge, Chris D’Amato, and
Jessica Watkins who helped collect data, and Amy Wollock
and Alan Van Heuvelen for their comments and suggestions
on the paper. I also want to express special thanks to Robert
Beichner, David Meltzer, Peter Shaffer, and three anonymous
reviewers who helped revise and improve the paper.
APPENDIX A
Multiple paths that lead to becoming a physics teacher
through Rutgers. Diagram 1 shows multiple paths to becom-
ing a teacher.
I want to be a physics teacher in
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |