Contents introduction 3 chapter I. Basic approaches to learning language material in linguistic 5

Lesson plan:
In the study, an experiment was conducted in classes with not in-depth study of a foreign language. To conduct the experimental work was chosen this type of experiment, as a comparative. We planned that in one group (control) work in the classroom generalizing the recurrence is conducted by a conventional method and the other group (experimental) with the use of methods and means of formation of communicative activities discussed in this paper.
The aim of this study is to conduct a synthesis of lessons of repetition in foreign language using the above methods and ways of formation of communicative activities and without using them to prove their advantages.
To achieve this goal it is necessary to solve a number of problems:
- observation of students, measuring their level of knowledge (if alignment is needed);
- lessons with and without the use identified in first part of methods and ways of formation of communicative activities;
- processing and systematization of results;
The level of basic knowledge of students is average. Discipline is low, this is due to the age and specifics of the lesson. For holding slices of pupils we have identified as a form of control test tasks aimed at the control of vocabulary on the topic, as the knowledge of vocabulary on the topic is the main indicator of development of themes, and also no small role in the choice of forms of control was the fact that the vocabulary control is carried out more objectively and precisely.
Thus, we designed the experiment plan:
1. The first cut – diagnose the state of the dependent variable at the initial stage (a
test on the subject).
2. Processing and systematization of obtained data.
3. The second cut (the use of methods of formation of communicative
competence).
4. Processing and systematization of obtained data.
5. The results from all slices, and presentation of results.
In order for the results of the experiment proved to be the most accurate and truthful, it was necessary to determine the level of knowledge on the latter topic in each group, to compare and, if necessary, to align. To do this, we carried out the first slice. It was a test cross of choice, the purpose of which was to check the vocabulary on the topic.
Test results:
Group experiment – quality – 67%
The control group quality – 58%
Next, we continued working on this topic and within it held a second slice. It was a lesson of the generalized recurrence in the experimental and control groups, with and without using above mentioned methods and ways of formation of communicative competence.
In the experimental group used such techniques as:
· strip-story (each student gets the sentence and try to hold a place in the "story";
· contact (participants approach each other and begin the conversation);
· line-up (students as soon as possible try to line up in a row in accordance with the proposed topic);
· knowledge gap (one student has information that is not available to another, and it needs to fill);
· sketches;
Respectively in the control group lesson generalizing repetition on this topic passed without using all of the above – in the traditional system (reading, translation, writing grammar exercises execution)
Test results:
Group experiment – 81%
The control group – 50%