Contents introduction chapter I. Language tasks and exercise


positive-effective , having a good result 15.Presentation


Download 50.86 Kb.
bet9/10
Sana18.06.2023
Hajmi50.86 Kb.
#1569916
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10
Bog'liq
Classification of exercises in teaching English

14.positive-effective , having a good result
15.Presentation-to show or display your project or assignment
16.Visual aids- video or pictures related to topic which help facilitate understanding
17.Methods-specific way of doing or managing something
18.Effectiveness-having or achieving good result
19.Formation-to make a form of something
20.Principle-The basic idea that plan or system is based on
21.Productive-Effective, producing or achieving a lot
22.Communication- way of changing information or ideas.
23.Theory- basic idea that plan or system is based on
24. Activation-making students to be more active in the class and set of methods for doing this.
25. Structure-the certain pattern of doing or making something.


BIBLIOGRAPHY.

  1. 1.» Decision PQ-5117 dated May 19, 2021 of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan «On measures to bring the activity of popularizing the study of foreign languages to a qualitatively new level in the Republic of Uzbekistan.

  2. Abduazizov A.A. English phonetics. - Tashkent, Musiqa, 3rd revised edition, 2007- 258p.

  3. Bothell, T.D. (2001). Brigham Young University. Faculty Center. 14 Rules For Writing Multiple-Choice Questions. Retrieved from: https://testing.byu.edu/handbooks/14%20Rules%20for%20Writing%20MultipleChoice%20Questions.pdf (May 2019)

  4. Burton, S.J., Sudweeks, R.R., Merrill, P.F., Wood, B. Brigham Young University Testing Services and the Department of Instructional Science. (1991). How to Prepare Better Multiple-Choice Test Items: Guidelines for University Faculty. Retrieved from https://testing.byu.edu/handbooks/betteritems.pdf (Sept 2019)

  5. Clay, B (2001). Is This a Trick Question? A Short Guide to Writing Effective Test Questions. Retrieved from: https://www.k-state.edu/ksde/alp/resources/Handout-Module6.pdf (May 2019).

  6. Davis, B. (2009). Tools for Teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Designing Multiple-Choice Questions. Centre for Teaching Excellence, University of Waterloo. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://uwaterloo.ca/centre-for-teaching-excellence/teachingresources/teaching-tips/developing-assignments/exams/questions-types-characteristicssuggestions (March 2019) Designing Quality Multiple Choice Questions. Yale University, Poorvu Center for Teaching and Learning, retrieved from https://poorvucenter.yale.edu/MultipleChoiceQuestions (June 2019)

  7. Fozzard, N., Pearson, A., du Toit, E., Naug, H., Wen, W., Peak, I.R. Analysis of MCQ and distractor use in a large first year Health Faculty Foundation Program: assessing the effects of changing from five to four options. BMC Medical Education. Volume 18, Article number: 252 (2018)

  8. Hamilton, L., Halverson, R. Jackson, Ss, Mandinach, E., Supovitz, J., & Wayman, J. (2009). Using student achievement data to support instructional decision making (NCEE 2009-4067).

  9. Jalolov J. J., Makhkamova G.T., Ashurov Sh. S. English language teaching methodology (theory and practice). — Tashkent: UzSWLU, 2014.— 336 р.




  1. Jacobson, M. Werklund School of Education, University of Calgary. (n.d.). Multiple Choice Item Construction. Retrieved from https://people.ucalgary.ca/~dmjacobs/portage/index.htm (June 2019)

  2. Suskie, L. (2009). Assessing Student Learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Three Options Are Optimal for Multiple-Choice Items: A Meta-Analysis of 80 Years of Research, Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, Volume 24, Number 2, June 2005, pp. 3-13. Retrieved from: https://www.ernweb.com/educational-research-articles/the-optimal-numberof-choices-in-a-multiple-choice-test/ (Sept 2019)

  3. Sedita, J (2019). Keys to Beginning Reading. Rowley, MA: Keys to Literacy.

  4. Torgesen, J. K. (2006) A comprehensive K-3 reading assessment plan: Guidance for school leaders. Portsmouth, NH. RMC Research Corporation, Center on Instruction https://www.fcrr.org/assessment/pdf/K-3%20Reading%20assessment.pdf

  5. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.



Download 50.86 Kb.

Do'stlaringiz bilan baham:
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10




Ma'lumotlar bazasi mualliflik huquqi bilan himoyalangan ©fayllar.org 2024
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling