ANALYSING CLAUSES
The clause patterns and verb patterns discussed in sections A8 and B8 are in many
ways two sides of the same coin. If we have worked out the clause pattern then we
generally know the verb pattern. Thus if there is an SVOO pattern this indicates that
the verb is ditransitive; if SVOP, then link transitive.
There are some differences, however. The analysis of a passive such as It has been
finished in terms of clause pattern – SV – would not correspond to the verb pattern:
transitive. And sometimes the classification of the verb is not sensitive enough to
distinguish two different underlying structures e.g. to label a verb link transitive would
not describe the patterns of a verb fully; see the activity with make below.
Moreover, their purposes are different. Clause pattern analysis is more appropri
ate for the analysis of texts, i.e. of alreadyexisting language, whereas a knowledge of
verb patterns is more useful in constructing texts correctly (though it can also explain
cases of ambiguity).
C8.1 Analysing clause patterns
When analysing clauses, we need to be able to distinguish cases where a unit is
an element in its own right and where it is only part of an element. This can be
particularly tricky when clauses are involved inside the clause we are interested in.
Thus in
He’s a man that we can trust.
the underlined clause is a relative clause that postmodifies man; in other words, it is
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |