Hakikat Kitabevi Publications No: 10 answer to an enemy of islam

Talfîq is to unite two or more of the four madhhabs.
Also, his reference to Ibn Humâm is a lie, since Ibn Humâm
wrote in his book 
Tahrîr, “When imitating another madhhab, one
should not do anything which is wrong according to either of the
two madhhabs he is following. If a person, by following the Shâfi’î
madhhab, does not rub his limbs with his hands while performing
a wudû’ (ritual ablution), and if he touches a woman [he is/was
permitted to marry with an Islamic nikâh] thinking that his ritual
ablution will not break with this touch according to the Mâlikî
madhhab, the salât which he performs with this ablution will be
invalid (bâtil) according to both madhhabs.” The book 
Khulâsat
at-tahqîq puts forth these words of Ibn Humâm as an evidence for
proving the fact that it is not permissible to unify madhhabs. The
enemy of Islam who comes forth as a man with religious duties
– 49 –
[1] The tenth, eleventh, twelfth and thirteenth days of the month of
Zu’lhijja. Please see the fourth chapter of 
Endless Bliss, V.
[2] A kind of alms, explained in the third chapter of 
Endless Bliss, V.

---

changes Ibn Humâm’s words in order to deceive Muslims, and
thus abominably slanders this great imâm. Moreover, it was
Shaikh Qâsim, Ibn Humâm’s disciple, who wrote that talfîq was
not acceptable and that there was even ijmâ’ on it. Shaikh Qâsim
wrote about this ijmâ’, which he learned from his master, Ibn
Humâm, in his book 
At-tas’hîh, which is a commentary on Al-
Qudûrî.
It is written also in 
ad-Durar that it will not be against the
Hanafî madhhab for a Hanafî muftî to issue a fatwa in accordance
with the ijtihâd of Imâm Abû Yûsuf or Imâm Muhammad ash-
Shaibânî, since both the imâms told that each of their ijtihâds
disagreeing with al-Imâm al-a’zam was a report which they had
heard from al-Imâm al-a’zam. For this reason, Ibn ’Âbidîn wrote
in the marginalia of