Lingvist oxirgi shakl 1-son indd

CONCLUSION
The purpose of studying and “mapping” reference niches can 
be: 1) scientific reconstruction of the overall picture of “value-signif-
icant” for culture “parameters”, according to which the world around 
is assessed; 2) a valid representation of the value system from the 
point of view of their integral hierarchy, i.e., taking into account their 
location in the general axiological coordinate system, woven from 
ideas about what is “good / bad”, “good / evil”, “up / down”, etc.; 3) 
determining the significance for a given culture as a whole of certain 
values by identifying the belonging of reference niches to the core or 
periphery of the indicated overall picture. It seems that such an ap-
proach can provide researchers with specific tools for verifying the 
conclusions about the spiritual code of culture.
The symbolic subsystem of linguistic culture has the same 
tendency to be culturally conditioned as the considered subsystem 
of basic standards, a fairy tale - the rest was just a fairy tale, etc.. The 
symbolic subsystem of linguistic culture has the same tendency to 
be culturally conditioned as the considered subsystem of basic stan-
dards.
Etymologists and anthropologists have known for a long time 
that a dialect’s uses and tenors reflect the social values of the culture 
in which it is spoken. For dialect learners to be proficient in that dia-
Umida DJALILOVA
144

---

lect, phonological proficiency is insufficient. Dialect learners should 
be aware that the target dialect’s dialect community members may 
perceive behaviors and sounds that are appropriate in their commu-
nity in unexpected ways. They must understand that language use 
must be connected to other socially acceptable actions in order for 
communication to be successful. 
Language is the most important means of communication be-
tween people and a tool for conveying ideas to others. Language is 
the mirror of a nation’s culture and the treasure that preserves it.
Referenses
Arutyunova, N. D. 1998. Language and the world of man. Moscow. 
Assman, J. 2004. Cultural memory: Writing and memory of the past and po-
liticalidentity in the high cultures of antiquity. Moscow. 
Telia, V.N. 2006. Large phraseological dictionary of the Russian language. 
Meaning. Use. Culturological commentary / Otv. ed. Moscow. 
Vezhbitskaya, A. 1996. Language. Culture. Cognition. Moscow. 
Durkheim, E. 1995. Sociology. Its subject, method, purpose. Moscow. 
Karaulov Y.N. 1987. Russian language and linguistic personality. Moscow.
What is a linguistic personality? 1995. Ethnic and linguistic self-awareness. 
Moscow.
Lotman Y.M. 1992. Memory in cultural illumination. Selected articles. 
D.K.Baxronova. 2021. Olam manzarasining milliy-madaniy va lingvokogni-
tiv kategoriyalanishi. Tashkent. 
Dilrabo Keldiyorovna Bakhronova. 2020. Psycholinguistic Factors of For-
eign Language Teaching To Students and Cadets (on the exam-
ple of the Uzbek language. GIS Business. 
Bakhronova, D., Abduvakhitovna, M.D., Rustamovna, K.F., Sabohat, H., 
& Ibrohimovna, M.S. 2019. Peculiarities of intercultural 
competence in teaching foreign languages. Religación. Revista 
De Ciencias Sociales Y Humanidades, 4(18).
The role of linguoculture in the linguistic studies