Microsoft Word Revised Syllabus Ver doc

Interpretation
Within this activity, the reader performs interpretations at different levels; first, he/she 
seeks to identify the conventions and operations which produce its observable effects on 
meaning, thus interpretation. Yet this reading can only be partially directed since there arises 
a level of unexpected decoding second, textual strategies come to be in interplay with reading 
strategies. Finally, if the responsible interpreter refers of this act is the translator; he/she takes 
the place of the concrete reader of the ST, and appropriates part of the horizon originally 
envisioned by the author.

---

88 
In this act of interpretation, the translator's persona (the writing-self assumed the text), 
the empirical person (individual concrete circumstances, private and cultural 
presuppositions), and the psycho-social factors external to the work, determine distinct 
relations in the, interplay between ST and RT, and this phenomenon may account to a certain 
extent for the textual strategies choose, which in turn will affect the receivers response in the 
RT Provisionally, we can distinguish three dimensions of the ST within the semiotic 
perspective:
(1) As object of reading which will provoke questions and reflections 
(2) As text, in which the completion of this act of reading is guided by the objective of 
Recoding 
(3) As textual object of reading and writing for specific addresses, who in turn, creates
(generates) a new chain of communication.
The Translation's (RT) genesis, from its beginning to its completed transcription, 
marks another phase in the interpretative act because the ST is no longer a purely inner, 
psychological or unstructured text as verbal sequence. In the RT the reading and writing 
stages of the translator come to an end; yet it is important to underline that the interpretative 
act is transferred now from translator to reader to the RT, and a new stage begins in the 
reception of this text, creating new interpretations and responses.