Monocomplementive, tran-sit I vc The railings

participle in the sentence are those of the attribute and the predicative. Cf.:
Moyra's softened look gave him a new hope. (Past parti­ciple attributive front-position) The cleverly chosen timing of the attack determined the outcome of the battle. (Past participle attributive front-position) It is a face devastated by passion. (Past participle attributive back-position) Mis was a victory gained against all rules and predictions. (Past participle attributive back-position) Looked upon in this light, the wording of the will didn't appear so odious. (Past participle attributive detached position) The light is bright and inconveniently placed for reading. (Past participle pred­icative position)
The past participle is included in the structural formation of the present participle (perfect, passive), which, together with the other differential properties, vindicates the treat­ment of this form as a separate verbid.
In the attributive use, the past participial meanings of the perfect and the passive are expressed in dynamic corre­lation with the aspective lexico-grammatical character of the verb. As a result of this correlation, the attributive past participle of limitive verbs in a neutral context expresses prior­ity, while the past participle of unlimitive verbs expresses simultaneity. E.g.:
A tree broken by the storm blocked the narrow passage between the cliffs and the water. (Priority in the passive; the implication is "a tree that had been broken by the storm") I saw that the picture admired by the general public hardly had a fair chance with the judges. (Simultaneity in the pas­sive; the implication is "the picture which was being admired by the public")
Like the present participle, the past participle is capable of making up semi-predicative const met ions of complex object, complex subject, as well as of absolute complex.
The past participial complex object is specifically char­acteristic with verbs of wish and oblique causality (have,
get). Cf.:
I want the document prepared for signing by 4 p.m. Will you have my coat brushed up, please?

113

8-1499

Compare the use of the past participial complex object

and the complex subject as its passive transform with a per­ception verb:
We could hear a shot or (wo fired from a field mortar.-* A shot or two could be heard fired from a field mortar.
The complex subject of this type, whose participle is included iu the double predicate of the sentence, is used but occasionally. A more common type of the participial com­plex subject can be seen with notional links of motion and position. Cf.: We sank down and for a while lay there stretched out and exhausted.
The absolute past participial complex as a rule expresses priority in the correlation of two events. Cf.: The preliminary talks completed, it became possible to concentrate on the central point of the agenda.
The past participles of non-objective verbs are rarely used in independent sentence-part positions; they are mostly in­cluded in phraseological or cliche combinations like faded photographs, fallen leaves, a retired officer, a withered flower, dream come true, etc. In these and similar cases the idea of pure quality rather than that of processual quality is ex­pressed, the modifying participles showing the features of adjectivization.
As is known, the past participle is traditionally inter­preted as being capable of adverbial-related use (like the present participle), notably in detached syntactical positions, after the introductory subordinative conjunctions. Cf.:
Called up by the conservative minority, the convention failed to pass a satisfactory resolution. Though welcomed heartily by his host, Frederick felt at once that something was wrong.
Approached from the paradigmatic point of view in the constructional sense, this interpretation is to be re-consid­ered. As a matter of fact, past participial constructions of the type in question display clear cases of syntactic compression. The true categorial nature of the participial forms employed by them is exposed by the corresponding transformational correlations ("back transformations") as being not of adver­bial, but of definitely adjectival relation. Cf.: