Rise and Fall of an Information Technology Outsourcing Program: a qualitative Analysis of a Troubled Corporate Initiative
Employees who “never saw it coming.”
Download 1.05 Mb. Pdf ko'rish
|
Rise and Fall of an Information Technology Outsourcing Program A
Employees who “never saw it coming.”
Employees were generally uneasy over the email invitation from Richard on Friday afternoon and walking into the town hall meeting Monday morning. Like awkward and self-conscious teenagers filing in for an assembly in the gym, the apprehensive employees were unsure of what the “principal” was going to ask them to sit through: We get in there, and [Richard] is an introvert anyway. [Richard] looks a little nervous, but that’s normal. Everybody’s looking around trying to see who’s there and looking around to see who’s part of the announcement, and who’s hearing it and it’s interesting . . . I got the idea afterwards there were people that maybe you thought they knew or maybe they would have known [more information in advance] . . . [however] they might not have been in the loop. Maybe they were supposed to be. That’s some interesting stuff. (Employee, personal communication, December 14, 2012) Another employee recalled the initial lack of clarity in Richard’s messages. The extent to which these employees absorbed the news of SSP was clearly different from those employees who received the news informally: It was literally, from my perspective, it was like twenty minutes into the meeting and I saw what appeared from my judgment to be a lot of confusion. Like, “What is [Richard] saying? What does this mean?” I don’t think it was until [Richard] made the comparison 146 to or [Richard] asked, “A question you might have is how is, ‘How is this any different from [executives’ exemplar firm with the failed outsourcing program]?’” My observation was light bulbs went off then like, “Oh, my gosh. We’re talking about outsourcing?” (Employee, personal communication, November 7, 2012) Some of the employees with advanced notice were not surprised, but were obliged to act surprised in the town hall; other employees were genuinely surprised because their managers were not as “good” about doling out favors. Those employees who witnessed the town hall performance for the first time had difficulty making sense of what Richard was telling them. The message received by these employees was unequal to what the other group of employees received with their brief backstage privileges. The employees who learned the news from Richard’s front stage town hall performance described feeling “stunned” and “shocked.” “It was stunned silence. There were questions, but it was really quiet and it was stunned for most people” (Employee, personal communication, December 14, 2012). Another employee shared, “I think it took me about two days to get over the shock. I was like, ‘all right, it is what it is, I got a job to do so I’m just going to keep doing that till they throw the boxes and say you’re moving’” (Employee, personal communication, January 8, 2013). Yet another described feeling insulted by executives who asked the employees to perform “business as usual” over the coming months: When we first heard it and everybody’s going, “How does this affect me? How does it affect my project?” [Executives] kept saying, “It’s business as usual.” That phrase . . . it doesn’t apply anymore. Your life is going to be different . . . At least to engineers, to say, “It’s business as usual and that your project deadlines are going to hold and you’ll most likely be the person executing on that blah, blah, blah.” It’s not business as usual. Your 147 head isn’t in the same spot. It’s a little bit insulting just because . . . It’s almost like they’re saying, “Just do what you were doing. You’re on an assembly line [in a software factory] and keep doing that.” Even though you do need to keep doing that, there are discussions to be had, “What happens if the [vendor] is coming in mid-project?” Basically, they’re saying, “Don’t worry about that. Don’t worry about all those things.” (Employee, personal communication, December 14, 2012) For executives who followed the secrecy code, their employees were devastated by the news. The statusing and transparency norms of the Icarus habitus created de facto expectations among employees that they would learn of this type of personal impact in a more private setting. At a high-stakes moment when these employees had several questions about the announcement and its impact to them, the large-group nature of the town hall inhibited employees from asking questions. These employees immediately focused and speculated on the personal impact SSP would have on them. Other interviewees shared the need to “update my resume” and “start looking for a new job,” although very few of these employees actually left Icarus after first hearing the announcement in mid-2012. Recall the manager in the previous section who received the advance information about SSP from their senior manager, who was on the Working Team. As a result of that informal conversation, that manager described their ability to support their team immediately after the town hall announcement. A different manager, who did not receive advance backstage information, described their experience of hearing the information formally and at the same time as the rank and file employees: It was a little bit jarring and a little bit shocking, especially for my team because typically when things like that are announced, my team gets nervous. They expect that I would 148 have heard about it ahead of time so that I have all the answers for them. Usually how it goes is, “Yes, I heard about this last week. Here’s all the answers to your questions.” This time, everybody kind of freaked out. They’re coming to me for questions, and I’m like, “You know what guys? I’m hearing about this same time you are,” which really left the team feeling really unsettled, like, “Wow, they didn’t even tell my manager before this happened.” They got a little bit worked up by that, and that’s feedback I gave [the Working Team] and the others within the SSP. It was like, “Hey, I get it, you couldn’t let it out early, but for the people managing resources I think a little bit of heads up [or] having those Q&A [question and answer] or [a] forum that had questions and answers ahead of time would have been helpful.” I think initially a few team members . . . well . . . I think all of them were pretty shocked by it. It’s kind of like, “What does this mean for me? Am I losing my job? What’s going on?” (Employee, personal communication, November 30, 2012). Richard, Donald, and other Icarus executives had over a year to debate, decide, and acclimate to the capacity problem and Supply Chain’s purported “non-differentiation” as rational reasons for SSP. Employees who did not receive advance notice heard about SSP and the impacts to their jobs, very abruptly, and for the first time in the town hall meeting. In some cases, managers and employees learned of SSP together. As the manager described above, employees expected a degree of information asymmetry with their mangers, and it reassured them they could go to their managers with questions. Culturally, they expected that their managers would have received the communication plan with frequently asked questions in advance. They also desired to have smaller group or informal conversations with their managers. These employees wanted a safer environment to express concerns they were not comfortable sharing publicly in the town hall— 149 they wanted their own backstage access. Instances where managers and their employees learned about SSP for the first time together were viewed as highly disruptive and a deviation from their cultural expectations. Despite the majority of employees’ initial reactions, many begin to generally support SSP throughout the latter half of 2012 as executives shared further “evidence” of the capacity problem discussed in Chapter Six. Nevertheless, Richard’s ritualized and highly scripted performance of the initial town hall meeting was ineffective compared to the backstage ritual enacted by Working Team members and the small number of executives who chose to deviate from the prescribed SSP communication plan. Based on the experiences described by many employees, the town hall ritual was an ineffective and poor performance. Download 1.05 Mb. Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |
Ma'lumotlar bazasi mualliflik huquqi bilan himoyalangan ©fayllar.org 2024
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling