Some practice in translation

Grammatical problems
General considerations
Equivalence, as has been pointed, is achieved by different transformations: grammatical, lexical, stylistic. The present part deals with grammatical transformations and their causes. The causes generating these transformations are not always purely grammatical but may be lexical as well, though grammatical causes naturally prevail due to differences in the SL and TL grammatical structures.
Not infrequently, grammatical and lexical causes are so closely interwoven that the required transformations are of a twofold character. The following example illustrates this point.
The vigil of the U.S. Embassy supported last week by many prominent people and still continuing, the marches last Saturday, the resolutions of organizations have done something to show that the Prime Minister does not speak for Britain.
Круглосуточная демонстрация у здания американского посольства, получившая на прошлой неделе поддержку многих видных деятелей, все еще продолжается. Эта демонстрация и состоявшиеся в субботу походы, а также принятые различными организациями резолюции, явно свидетельствуют о том, что премьер-министр отнюдь не говорит от имени всего английского народа.
A number of lexical and grammatical transformations have been effected in: 1) the long English sentence in which the Subject is expressed by 3 homogeneous members: the vigil, the marches, the resolutions, is translated by two separate Russian sentences. The structure of the English sentence is typical of the structure of brief notes or of leads which usually contain miscellaneous information on the principles of “who, what, when, where and how”. This, however, is not usual in Russian newspaper style. The word демонстрация is repeated as both sentences have the same Subject. 2) The word “vigil” has recently developed a new meaning – “around the clock demonstration”. This new meaning is accordingly rendered by two words: круглосуточная демонстрация; similarly, the Participle “supported” is also rendered by two Russian words: получившая поддержку; 3) a number of additional words have been introduced: у здания (посольства), состоявшиеся (в субботу походы), а также принятые различными (организациями резолюции). 4) The word “last” has been omitted as its meaning is implied in the Russian Adverbial of Time (в субботу); 5) the Emphatic meaning of the Predicate with its Object: have done something to show, is conveyed by the Adverb явно. 6) The Cliché: speak for Britain is rendered by a corresponding Cliché говорить от имени. 7) the Metonymy (Britain) is translated by the words it stands for – весь английский народ.
Strictly speaking only the translation of the complex sentence by meaning of 2 sentences can be regarded as a purely grammatical transformation, whereas all the other transformations are of a mixed character – both lexical and grammatical.